Skip to main content
Post Closed as "not constructive" by FumbleFingers, nohat
added 13 characters in body
Source Link
Thursagen
  • 42.2k
  • 44
  • 173
  • 243

The pronoun 'he' used generically, as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" or generic "man" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recentlyor did there use to be politicallly correcta difference in terms between male and female?

The pronoun 'he' used generically, as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" or generic "man" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

The pronoun 'he' used generically, as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" or generic "man" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case or did there use to be a difference in terms between male and female?

added 34 characters in body
Source Link
Thursagen
  • 42.2k
  • 44
  • 173
  • 243

The pronoun 'he' used generically, as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" or generic "man" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

The pronoun 'he', as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

The pronoun 'he' used generically, as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" or generic "man" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

deleted 6 characters in body
Source Link
Thursagen
  • 42.2k
  • 44
  • 173
  • 243

The pronoun 'he', as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" are sex-biased and are no longernot acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

The pronoun 'he', as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" are sex-biased and are no longer acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

The pronoun 'he', as well as a lot of words including "man-kind" are sex-biased and are not acceptable. However, not so long ago, they were the proper used terms for describing the general. For example, "Man must adjust to his environment." or "He that loves must forgive." etc. Was this always the case and then it changed recently to be politicallly correct?

Source Link
Thursagen
  • 42.2k
  • 44
  • 173
  • 243
Loading