Timeline for What is the opposite of decoupled (computer science)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 0:58 | answer | added | Jelila | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 22:17 | comment | added | Michael Deardeuff | "Coupled" in this context is more than putting pieces together, it's not being able to pull them apart. | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 20:37 | comment | added | Kevin Krumwiede | The connotation of any potential answer will vary greatly depending on the context. Given a particular programming paradigm, language, platform, and level of abstraction (i.e., the entire application vs. the subcomponents thereof), a term like "monolithic" or "tightly coupled" might have implications ranging from inevitable to practical to outrageously awful. | |
| Jul 19, 2015 at 20:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglish/status/622858643327873024 | ||
| Jul 19, 2015 at 17:05 | answer | added | Erick G. Hagstrom | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 22:56 | answer | added | Anton | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 19:32 | comment | added | Hot Licks | Another term that maybe fits your needs better and is generally considered negative is "poorly structured". | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 19:29 | comment | added | Hot Licks | "Tightly-coupled" would be the other extreme. (And I'm not sure you can find something that is unambiguously negative since tight coupling is often a good thing.) | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 18:12 | vote | accept | Brett Stottlemyer | ||
| Jul 18, 2015 at 17:42 | answer | added | Prem | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 17:26 | answer | added | Drew | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 16:02 | answer | added | Andrew Leach♦ | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 15:55 | answer | added | prosd | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 15:39 | answer | added | Doug Warren | timeline score: 22 | |
| Jul 18, 2015 at 15:31 | history | asked | Brett Stottlemyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |