Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 9, 2015 at 12:17 comment added Hot Licks @erich - You know, if you don't like my answer you can write your own.
May 9, 2015 at 11:52 comment added Erich also, note what follows in the same paragraph: "...he invited and received into his house the family of his nephew, Mr. Henry Dashwood, the legal inheritor of the Norland estate, and the person to whom he intended to bequeath it."
May 9, 2015 at 11:50 comment added Erich agreed, and in this case, i would not limit it to just the land, but rather their entire domain: land, buildings, residence, and any other ancillary value tied up in it.
May 9, 2015 at 11:48 comment added Hot Licks @erich - Certainly there can be more on the estate than just the residence. Some old estates were small towns in themselves.
May 9, 2015 at 11:46 comment added Erich estates include much more than the land; they include all the buildings as well. not all buildings are the owner's residence; particularly back in the victorian era and before, commoners did not own the land -- the owning gentry would allow them to live there in exchange for working the land.
May 9, 2015 at 11:38 comment added Hot Licks @erich - Google "lived on a large estate" (with the quotes).
May 9, 2015 at 11:33 comment added Hot Licks @erich - In the above quote the term "estate" was clearly referring to the specific (large) property containing the residence. (Though I can see how one might read it the other way if not familiar with the term "estate".)
May 9, 2015 at 11:30 comment added Erich in this case, i would argue that estate refers to everything they are entitled to (ownership-wise), and property refers to the land proper (no pun intended), as it says their residence was located in the middle of it.
May 9, 2015 at 11:25 history answered Hot Licks CC BY-SA 3.0