Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 5, 2015 at 13:54 comment added Edwin Ashworth FumbleFingers has written: ]. Premature pre-emptive answers are no benefit to the site, so I [can’t] see any problem with them being downvoted if they don't answer the "final, clarified" question. If nothing else, this might discourage those hasty answerers from leaving what eventually amounts to "litter" on the site. FF >> Since Shoe asks for clarification (None of them seems right. Is this copied correctly? What is the context?), this question is obviously not suitable for ELU as it stands. And it's very basic. Answering it devalues the site.
Apr 5, 2015 at 10:52 comment added bobro "went on driving for two hours" would be fine. But! if "two hours" has some special import, you might say "went on the driving those two hours". "She gabbed without stop for what seemed like ages, but he went on driving those two hours, clenching his teeth."
Apr 5, 2015 at 10:33 comment added Heba OK, if we assumed that 'went on' is a phrasal verb, would 'two-hours' then be the answer that best makes sense? (oh, and sorry about my English, as it's not my mother tongue).
Apr 5, 2015 at 10:33 vote accept Heba
Apr 5, 2015 at 10:24 comment added Andy Semyonov It could be a very straightforward sentence, where least care is given to prepositions.
Apr 5, 2015 at 10:21 history answered bobro CC BY-SA 3.0