Timeline for A word for 'to empathize without identifying with'
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2015 at 7:24 | vote | accept | OscarE | ||
| Mar 30, 2015 at 22:08 | answer | added | Steven K | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 30, 2015 at 21:42 | answer | added | Dave Magner | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 27, 2015 at 14:36 | answer | added | darkree | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 27, 2015 at 10:40 | answer | added | Brian Hitchcock | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 16:04 | comment | added | OscarE | The closet term I could find so far is 'cognitive empathy', so to use it as a verb would be 'cognitively empathize'? I might have to settle for that. I was also thinking of using 'commensal empathy' if that makes sense. I would rather have any phrase that avoids the ambiguity of 'empathy' altogether at this point though. | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | OscarE | Josh, I'm looking for a word that's not about agreeing or even disagreeing with the person's feelings/reactions. I merely want a word that merely states our ability to understand or imagine with accuracy another's process, akin to what a good actor can do. I just don't want acceptance/approval of said process to be so implicitly implied, especially if the actor's playing a villain. Conceptualize is good but it's not interdependent enough. | |
| S Mar 26, 2015 at 9:50 | history | suggested | dartonw | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
change title to reflect term in question
|
| Mar 26, 2015 at 9:15 | comment | added | dartonw | Maybe conceptualize? | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 9:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 26, 2015 at 9:50 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2015 at 8:30 | comment | added | user66974 | How can you put yourself in the shoes of a serial killer without personal feelings or emotions? | |
| Mar 26, 2015 at 8:23 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 26, 2015 at 10:54 | |||||
| Mar 26, 2015 at 8:21 | history | asked | OscarE | CC BY-SA 3.0 |