Skip to main content
added 1 character in body
Source Link

My intuitive understanding for transliteration of /x/ as kh has been simply that /k/ like /x/ is velar, while /h/ is glottal. So prepending 'k' to an 'h' suggestsuggests that the sound should be fricative like 'h', but with a velar articulation.

My intuitive understanding for transliteration of /x/ as kh has been simply that /k/ like /x/ is velar, while /h/ is glottal. So prepending 'k' to an 'h' suggest that the sound should be fricative like 'h', but with a velar articulation.

My intuitive understanding for transliteration of /x/ as kh has been simply that /k/ like /x/ is velar, while /h/ is glottal. So prepending 'k' to an 'h' suggests that the sound should be fricative like 'h', but with a velar articulation.

Source Link

My intuitive understanding for transliteration of /x/ as kh has been simply that /k/ like /x/ is velar, while /h/ is glottal. So prepending 'k' to an 'h' suggest that the sound should be fricative like 'h', but with a velar articulation.