Skip to main content
36 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Feb 20, 2015 at 7:09 answer added Fibericon timeline score: 2
Nov 20, 2014 at 7:41 history protected Andrew Leach
Nov 2, 2014 at 13:12 vote accept Centaurus
Oct 26, 2014 at 17:47 comment added Centaurus @CanisLupus With reference to your question on "how the term would be used", as someone who has been here for a long time and has answered 388 questions so far, you don't seem to have the same rigid standards every time you answer a question. english.stackexchange.com/questions/158178/… or english.stackexchange.com/questions/157795/… This last one... is it about English language ? Or Physics ?
Oct 26, 2014 at 17:36 comment added Centaurus @CanisLupus uptodate.com/contents/… This is the link.
Oct 26, 2014 at 16:45 comment added Canis Lupus Are you interested in the subject of ED or EDS? The link in your last comment looks irrelevant to ED, but relevant to EDS. What do you mean "not looking for lists"? What is your native language and what are some or the corresponding pejorative terms that you refer to in that language? To keep answers focused, typically some context, like how these terms would be used, is helpful. As someone who has contributed here for several months, you should know that this information, if added, should go into an edit of the question, and not in the comments.
Oct 26, 2014 at 16:28 comment added Centaurus @CanisLupus The reference site is uptodate.com/contents/… where I am a subscriber and it's one of the most reliable sites on medical matters. I could have got the definition at Wikipédia or another non-medical site but I treat medical matters as they should be treated. And sure "it took 12 hours for a correction to be made". First, you didn't mention that flaw to me. Second, even if you did, I posted the question late at night and then went to bed.
Oct 26, 2014 at 16:23 comment added Centaurus @CanisLupus Nobody mentioned "a web page that makes no mention of the topic to me". Instead, it was flagged to one of the moderators. Had you mentioned it in your comment, I would have given you the right explanation. But it seems to me is that what you wanted from the start was to see the question closed.
Oct 26, 2014 at 15:41 comment added SrJoven Here's my take on why I said POB/fishing. Regardless of if the subject is on topic, it is not a good fit (and this is my opinion, likely shared with others) to find pejoratives for the sake of finding pejoratives. Yes, I know the OP says "no list" but what does one expect from the question? One suggested word or a yes/no answer? Then only one answer need be given. But more importantly, what problem does the question solve? Why would this site be good to provide a [list of] pejorative[s] for a phrase? It seems contrary to be nice.
Oct 26, 2014 at 14:56 comment added Canis Lupus I would reconsider my remarks if it weren't for the fact that the single link referred to as "research" pointed to a web page that makes no mention of the topic. It took twelve hours for a correction to be made, and even then it was done by a Andrew, a long time contributor to this site, and not by the author of the question. And given that the Author claims to be an MD, I would hope he might have taken the hint he so explicitly asked for and provided improved content. It's not as if he arrived here yesterday.
Oct 26, 2014 at 13:51 comment added Centaurus @HotLicks whether pejorative or not, It's a word I already know.
Oct 26, 2014 at 13:13 comment added Hot Licks "Impotent" is a pejorative, in many contexts.
Oct 26, 2014 at 12:47 comment added Centaurus Only subscribers have access to it. But I can give you my login and password if you want to check.
Oct 26, 2014 at 12:45 comment added Andrew Leach @Centaurus You're free to keep the right reference if you link to the page containing that text and it's accessible to non-subscribers. Otherwise you risk spam flags (which is how this was brought to attention in the first place).
Oct 26, 2014 at 12:43 comment added Centaurus @Andrew Leach The definition was taken from "www.uptodate.com", a site I subscribe. Please, keep the right reference.
Oct 26, 2014 at 12:40 comment added Centaurus @CanisLupus I suspect any question related to sex will be labeled as "not a serious question" by a large number of members. There are, however, a few clues suggesting that mine doesn't fit that. First, my use of a technical vocabulary should point to that. Second, I explained that there are several terms for that in my mother tongue, and I don't know any in English. Third, I made it quite clear what I'm looking for and not for a moment did I try to sound funny or fresh. Last - and there's no way you could know that -I'm an MD, middle-aged, and my questions about the subject are always serious.
Oct 26, 2014 at 12:18 history edited Andrew Leach CC BY-SA 3.0
Better link to an actual source of that quote.
Oct 26, 2014 at 9:58 answer added rhetorician timeline score: 2
Oct 26, 2014 at 8:52 comment added Mari-Lou A Unfortunately, a question like ought to hit the "hot network questions", SE users would then confirm or offer alternative answers. In any case, the question is definitely ON TOPIC.
Oct 26, 2014 at 8:38 comment added Fattie @Centaurus - regarding the downvotes. Voting on this site is basically nuts, so just totally ignore it. I think just one problem is a lot of people here, uh, can't speak English and hence miss the tone of QA. To me your question reads as a perfectly straightforward, completely interesting, everyday question. It does not in the slightest come off as a "bevis and buthead" style "hee hee joke" question. Regarding "not enough research" it's just meaningless, the last 50 questions on here have no research and are just people asking things.
Oct 26, 2014 at 7:07 comment added Mari-Lou A Wow! Four downvotes and four upvotes (so far). Golly gosh, it appears to be a highly sensitive subject, and one many men prefer not to dwell on :P
Oct 26, 2014 at 6:59 comment added Mari-Lou A @CanisLupus he has shown research, he's included the definition of erectile dysfunction, the OP also wants to know in which English speaking country these slang words are commonly used, a very sensible request from a non-native speaker. I suppose he could have googled "slang impotency" but very often these "slang" sites offer an interminable list of expressions from which it is impossible to discern those that are more common and established than others.
Oct 26, 2014 at 6:22 answer added user66974 timeline score: 2
Oct 26, 2014 at 5:16 review Close votes
Oct 27, 2014 at 5:35
Oct 26, 2014 at 4:50 comment added Sylas Seabrook @ErikKowal I think I found it after my last comment: Primarily Opinion-Based. I disagree, though: "Does XYZ exist?" Can be easily established by demonstrating existence.
Oct 26, 2014 at 4:50 comment added Canis Lupus The flaw in our question is that you have shown no amount of research to indicate that there is an ounce of seriousness to it. In case I have the wrong impression, you should at least recognize that the way you posed your question points to that conclusion.
Oct 26, 2014 at 4:48 comment added Sylas Seabrook @SrJoven I don't see how POB fits here, so +1 ErikKowal.
Oct 26, 2014 at 3:52 comment added Blessed Geek Any downvotes to this question without the courtesy of explanation is symptomatic of it.
Oct 26, 2014 at 3:01 comment added Erik Kowal @SrJoven - What's 'POB'?
Oct 26, 2014 at 1:36 answer added ermanen timeline score: 6
Oct 26, 2014 at 1:13 comment added SrJoven POB, fishing, See don't ask.
Oct 26, 2014 at 0:58 comment added Centaurus Downvotes are welcome if they explain why they are given. We can only correct our flaws if we know what they are.
Oct 26, 2014 at 0:55 history edited anongoodnurse
edited tags
Oct 26, 2014 at 0:54 comment added Mari-Lou A I think there are more pejorative expressions for the lack of manhood than for its limpness. I shall be particularly interested in hearing any new slang terms. :)
Oct 26, 2014 at 0:47 history asked Centaurus CC BY-SA 3.0