Timeline for Is there an adjective for "cannot be defended against"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2014 at 12:31 | comment | added | Matthew Najmon | @AndrewLeach That's true of "undefendable", but "indefensible" is used with somewhat more versatility, perhaps because its deconstruction more vaguely implies non-association with a defense, whereas the deconstruction for "undefendable" is rather less ambiguous. | |
| Sep 5, 2014 at 5:53 | comment | added | Andrew Leach♦ | Because undefendable (or indefensible) means "cannot be defended", not "cannot be defended aganist". The OP wants a word to describe the attack, not its object. | |
| Sep 5, 2014 at 5:29 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 5, 2014 at 6:27 | |||||
| Sep 5, 2014 at 5:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 5, 2014 at 6:13 | |||||
| Sep 5, 2014 at 5:12 | history | answered | Franki | CC BY-SA 3.0 |