Timeline for "as well" instead of "and"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 at 12:02 | comment | added | Neeku | I think the latter is correct. I'm checking a few other dictionaries and websites, and none are explicitly mentioning not using it in written form. Also I've seen it a great deal in written articles, so I don't think there's anything wrong with using it in written English, especially in a text where you already have several alsos in sentences. | |
| Jul 11, 2014 at 11:57 | comment | added | Konrad Höffner | Thanks! Does that mean it is frowned upon to use it in writing or is it just not often done and not problematic for me to do? | |
| Jul 11, 2014 at 11:55 | vote | accept | Konrad Höffner | ||
| Jul 11, 2014 at 11:36 | history | edited | Neeku | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 18 characters in body
|
| Jul 11, 2014 at 10:12 | history | edited | Neeku | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 45 characters in body
|
| Jul 11, 2014 at 9:31 | history | edited | Andrew Leach♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct use-mention distinction with italics, not code-formatting
|
| Jul 11, 2014 at 9:27 | history | answered | Neeku | CC BY-SA 3.0 |