Timeline for How does one identify cacophonous and euphonious words?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2014 at 20:45 | vote | accept | sheeldotme | ||
| May 25, 2014 at 7:00 | answer | added | Leland jacobus | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 25, 2014 at 5:36 | answer | added | Kris | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 25, 2014 at 3:42 | answer | added | Brian Donovan | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 25, 2014 at 0:23 | comment | added | sheeldotme | There is no problem, I asked this question to improve my understanding of the terms, both your comments were helpful, thank you. | |
| May 25, 2014 at 0:18 | comment | added | John Lawler | The cacophonous ones sound bad, and the euphonious ones sound good. What's the problem? The perceived good- or badness can refer to the actual sounds of the words, or just as likely to their meanings. Either way, somebody doesn't like cacophony, and somebody does like euphony; you can do what you like with that information. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 23:29 | review | First posts | |||
| May 25, 2014 at 1:04 | |||||
| May 24, 2014 at 23:25 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | Most of us would probably classify gash, and cuddly, the same way, but there would probably be less of a consensus if we considered ogre and trout. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 23:11 | history | asked | sheeldotme | CC BY-SA 3.0 |