Timeline for How would you describe the technique/etiquette or "do's and don'ts" of having a conversation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2014 at 3:29 | comment | added | RyeɃreḁd | Erik - I didn't downvote but how it was originally was more of a comment and it still kind of is. I don't know if the OP understands why you think this and I thought I would save you a few points from a downvote you already had. | |
| May 25, 2014 at 0:30 | comment | added | Erik Kowal | @RyeɃreḁd - I forgot to add a tag to my response to you, which perhaps explains why you haven't yet explained your objection. However, I'd still be grateful for your clarification. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 6:58 | comment | added | Erik Kowal | I don't understand your objection. I am inviting the OP to reconsider one of the terms they used in the title, suitably reframed, because it appears to me to be the best solution to the problem they are trying to solve. In what sense does this "not provide an answer to the question"? | |
| May 24, 2014 at 5:50 | comment | added | RyeɃreḁd | This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. | |
| May 24, 2014 at 5:07 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 24, 2014 at 12:48 | |||||
| May 24, 2014 at 4:48 | history | answered | Erik Kowal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |