Timeline for Term or phrase (bygone era) where doodles were part and parcel to writing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2014 at 5:35 | history | edited | tchrist♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 19, 2014 at 5:33 | answer | added | tchrist♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 19, 2014 at 0:16 | answer | added | Erik Kowal | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 18, 2014 at 22:33 | comment | added | ipso | ”Marginalia” is worthy; and will be - perhaps - the first thing I remember a few weeks on. Thanks. | |
| May 18, 2014 at 22:25 | vote | accept | ipso | ||
| May 18, 2014 at 21:53 | answer | added | Third News | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:53 | comment | added | Frank | Maybe I'd gone too far with marginalia, but now I've found it on the internet that's my evenings filled. Thank you for misdirecting me to it. | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:44 | comment | added | ipso | @Frank - The term did not innately signify anything pornographic or subversive. More to do with what we've lost (limitations) in a pure-text based era. Nor did it really have to do directly with "illustrations" as aids - - more like simple flowery embellishments of mood. | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:40 | answer | added | user66974 | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:35 | comment | added | Frank | Is this link the sort of thing you mean io9.com/… | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:26 | comment | added | Frank | I saw something about that on TV years ago, it said that often the monks or whoever was writing/illustrating the book would add in little parts in the illustrations depicting some sort of pornographic scene. Can't remember what the style was called, maybe it'll come to me later. | |
| May 18, 2014 at 21:20 | history | asked | ipso | CC BY-SA 3.0 |