Timeline for What does "Bunk over" mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 11, 2014 at 1:24 | history | edited | Shisa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added a point
|
| Apr 11, 2014 at 1:21 | comment | added | Shisa | Re: first one, I'm definitely sure that's what was meant :) "Next Building" only makes sense if there's a "this building" and the only "this building" possible is Stark Tower. And the fact that Stark hung up a big sign with his name on his building is repeatedly considered noteworthy about the whole building. In addition it probably also might refer to Potts not wanting the next tower to be named Potts Tower (similar to Stark Tower) either. Which is a good point and I'll edit my answer to reflect this. :) | |
| Apr 11, 2014 at 1:18 | comment | added | Shisa | I don't think she meant 'you should specify it on / you should sign the lease'. I think she just meant 'Yes, the next building will have my name, but... only on the lease'. It's not Stark's building being gifted to her, she's the CEO of Stark Industries. | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 17:37 | comment | added | Bunch Son | As for my second question, I just want you to let it this straight for me. I've guessed given that the whole context, she answered jokingly "on the lease" (and that means "you specify it on the lease in order to assure it). I think you watched this movie before, so I would like confirm again. Are you sure your first answer is what she meant? and my guess above doesn't make sense and is unnatural? I apologize in advance if my English was so poor. | |
| Apr 10, 2014 at 17:20 | vote | accept | Bunch Son | ||
| Apr 10, 2014 at 7:26 | history | answered | Shisa | CC BY-SA 3.0 |