Timeline for A term that describes high-order ordinal numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 2, 2016 at 2:18 | comment | added | Mazura | subsidiary {as an adjective, pronounced without the imaginary 'r' after the second 'i', which is how I often here the business term (the noun) pronounced} | |
| Nov 2, 2016 at 1:54 | answer | added | SAH | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 21:54 | comment | added | SAH | "Supersecondary", "better" | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 16:20 | vote | accept | Herr K. | ||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 10:04 | comment | added | Fattie | Note that in some cases (to wit: see David's answer) you can simply say "higher". | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 5:40 | answer | added | David M | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 5:27 | answer | added | 000 | timeline score: -1 | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 23:04 | comment | added | tobyink | Personally I'd go with higher order, or perhaps higher rank depending on context. | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 22:30 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | An ellipsis could be used: 'Are there any secondary, tertiary, quaternary, ... equity offerings from this company?' | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 20:44 | answer | added | Oldcat | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 27, 2014 at 20:23 | history | asked | Herr K. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |