Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:41 comment added anongoodnurse Given that the subgroup of two won't always share a common adjective, I think noting that the comma here is doing exactly what the comma is meant to do, and suits the purpose well. It isn't awkward at all.
Mar 12, 2014 at 21:32 answer added M Vabulas timeline score: 0
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:58 comment added Edwin Ashworth There is not a hint of error in adding the comma. I can understand your feeling about the shift it might be taken to imply, but most people take the multi-purpose nature of the comma in their stride. Reading out "I need help finding brown and grey foxes, and turtles." people would probably use different stress (than for the comma-less version) rather than just add a pause.
Mar 12, 2014 at 20:03 comment added Michael I agree, better example; although, as I commented below, I feel the added comma ",and turtles" feels dissociated from the "finding brown and grey foxes". The added comma is entirely acceptable then? I do like the idea of '&' for less formal documents. Thanks!
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:00 answer added fdb timeline score: 0
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:00 history edited JSBձոգչ
edited tags
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:43 review First posts
Mar 12, 2014 at 17:09
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:38 comment added Edwin Ashworth Wouldn't a better example of a poorer arrangement be "I need help finding brown and grey foxes and turtles."? Rearranging it the way you do disambiguates. As does adding a comma / pause: "I need help finding brown and grey foxes, and turtles." With more complex situations, using & as a lower-level 'and' is used by some: "I can't decide between fish & chips, and bacon & eggs."
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:34 answer added Ronan timeline score: 1
Mar 12, 2014 at 16:25 history asked Michael CC BY-SA 3.0