Timeline for What's a good word for a category of non-technical blog posts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2016 at 1:12 | history | edited | herisson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
|
| May 11, 2016 at 22:35 | answer | added | user146163 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 13:07 | answer | added | RyeɃreḁd | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 12:52 | answer | added | George Cummins | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 12:41 | answer | added | user3074364 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 5:17 | answer | added | Neil W | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 13, 2014 at 4:48 | answer | added | A Brooks | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 12, 2014 at 23:58 | comment | added | Sven Yargs | If your website's technical posts target one or more smaller audiences of specialists, you could distinguish the list of nontechnical posts by labeling it "General Interest." This would have the additional benefit of implying that even readers interested in one or more of the special-interest categories might like the nontechnical ones as well—since "general interest" doesn't mean "only for nonspecialists." | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:28 | history | edited | dezman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 112 characters in body
|
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:13 | answer | added | ermanen | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:05 | comment | added | dezman | @ermanen It is a little to long, and it is defined in the negative, which I'm not excited about. It seems like there would be something better. | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:02 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:13 | |||||
| Mar 4, 2014 at 1:01 | comment | added | ermanen | Why don't you call it "non-technical" ? | |
| Mar 4, 2014 at 0:45 | history | asked | dezman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |