Timeline for Connotation of "maze" and "get maze"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2011 at 11:22 | vote | accept | donald | ||
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:43 | comment | added | bye | Yes -- it should be "get mazed" if you're going to use it at all. Using it at all, though, is probably not a good idea -- it would be like using stonied instead of astonished. It works perfectly if you want to write in the style of Mallory's Morte D'Arthur, but a vanishingly small number of modern readers would be able to derive any meaning from it. | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:41 | comment | added | Eldroß | @donald: it's not that it has grammar mistakes, it is much that one can't make any sense of it. What are you trying to say? | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:35 | history | edited | F'x | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 70 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:32 | comment | added | donald | Does "get maze" have any grammar mistake? thanks | |
| Mar 3, 2011 at 10:25 | history | answered | F'x | CC BY-SA 2.5 |