Timeline for by 5.30 or until 5.30/ why future tense?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 9, 2020 at 20:00 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 26, 2020 at 3:05 | |||||
Feb 9, 2020 at 8:35 | comment | added | BoldBen | There is a way that the second one makes sense but it is very unlikely to be used with the word only or the phrase they will be closed now. If it is 4:50 in the morning and the shops open very early someone might say "The shops will be open by 5:30, you can get some milk then." This means that at 5:30 the shops will be open because they start to open a bit before 5:30. The implication is, though, that they are not likely to be open much earlier than 5:15. | |
Dec 31, 2013 at 14:10 | history | edited | Kit Z. Fox♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
appended answer 143948 as supplemental
|
Dec 31, 2013 at 9:42 | answer | added | Damkerng T. | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 31, 2013 at 7:48 | answer | added | Peter | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 31, 2013 at 7:22 | comment | added | F.E. | Suppose it is now 7 PM, then "The shops are open only until 5:30 PM. They will be closed by now." The speaker thinks the shops are probably closed, since it is now 7 PM. The 2nd version of yours doesn't make sense to me either. -- The modals "will" and "would" have multiple uses, and many of them have nothing to do with future time; well, not directly. In my version of your #1 version, the word "will" has a meaning more like "ought to" or "should", e.g. "They should be closed by now". | |
Dec 31, 2013 at 7:07 | comment | added | akkatracker | The second one doesn't really make sense. Can't really explain it though | |
Dec 31, 2013 at 7:02 | history | asked | nima | CC BY-SA 3.0 |