Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 21, 2013 at 21:09 answer added MrHen timeline score: 4
Oct 13, 2013 at 11:11 comment added Kris I think this is a perfectly legitimate question for ELU. A phrase does not have to be idiomatic so long as it is grammatical, unambiguous, and makes sense. Depending on the context, I would certainly use the expression to reference a period of, say 30-40 years duration, from a time that is several decades old, not the recent past. What is wrong with the phrase per se?
Oct 12, 2013 at 21:13 review Close votes
Oct 13, 2013 at 11:13
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:13 comment added Edwin Ashworth Expressions start somewhere before they catch on (if they ever do), and perhaps vinny lammie's blog ('The good old decades') is starting a trend. However, I'd say that most Google hits for "old decades" are from people who can't handle idiomatic English, or chance juxtapositions (he was old decades ago, etc).
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:12 comment added Janus Bahs Jacquet To answer your second question: no, “in the old decades” does not mean the same as “a few decades ago”. The latter specifically talks about a few decades ago (for example, the 1970s or 1980s if seen from 2013), whereas ‘the old decades’ would be quite a bit further back in time.
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:07 comment added John Lawler It's grammatically correct, but it's very strange. The old days is the idiom, and, while decades makes sense (In past decades, ...), the old decades has to refer to 'those old decades that we discussed earlier'.
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:06 answer added ex-user2728 timeline score: -4
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:05 comment added Peter Shor There's nothing grammatically wrong with "in the old decades", but no native English speakers actually use it. They'd say "in earlier decades" instead.
Oct 12, 2013 at 19:02 review First posts
Oct 12, 2013 at 20:56
Oct 12, 2013 at 18:46 history asked IcySnow CC BY-SA 3.0