Timeline for A word which means the opposite of "something that works in parallel"
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 14, 2015 at 2:30 | comment | added | Hot Licks | The word sequentially implies some of the same things as concurrently. Which things?? | |
| Nov 14, 2015 at 2:19 | answer | added | Noishe | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 17:29 | answer | added | RussW | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 18, 2013 at 22:53 | answer | added | user49727 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 19, 2013 at 14:45 | vote | accept | alficles | ||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 18:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglish/status/368435126788956160 | ||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 18:04 | answer | added | Pieter Geerkens | timeline score: 12 | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:38 | comment | added | MetaEd | A common word for running a procedure which the system waits for is running it synchronously. | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:36 | answer | added | Matthew Lowe | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:33 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:39 | |||||
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:30 | comment | added | luk32 |
I believe in your 1st two examples you are mixing meaning of sequential/concurrent and blocking/non-blocking which I find more appropriate in this context. If you consider this, sequentially fits in the other examples.
|
|
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:23 | answer | added | Jacobm001 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 16, 2013 at 17:17 | history | asked | alficles | CC BY-SA 3.0 |