Timeline for Is there a context where 'to neglect' and 'neglecting' are not compatible? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 23, 2013 at 23:25 | history | closed |
FumbleFingers MetaEd cornbread ninja 麵包忍者 Kristina Lopez Mitch |
exact duplicate | |
Jun 22, 2013 at 10:24 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | You do realise that your original question is many times broader than the refinement you go on to describe? | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 6:13 | history | edited | Kris | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body; edited title
|
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:41 | answer | added | Cerberus - Reinstate Monica | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:24 | review | Close votes | |||
Jun 23, 2013 at 23:25 | |||||
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:20 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | @Kaiser Octavius: I know, and I've already closevoted as a dup of one of the vast number of earlier questions regarding infinitive/gerund (not that one, as it happens). But although we both know that's what OP means, that's not what he's asked. | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:14 | comment | added | Kaiser Octavius | @FumbleFingers: OP meant when the infinitive is the subject. | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:05 | comment | added | FumbleFingers | If "You are neglecting me" is changed to "You are to neglect me", it doesn't mean the same thing. And if "I don't mean to neglect you" is changed to "I don't mean neglecting you" it's no longer valid English at all. | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 1:02 | answer | added | terdon | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 0:56 | comment | added | Kaiser Octavius | Why do you keep using the tilde? | |
Jun 20, 2013 at 0:51 | history | asked | user46188 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |