Skip to main content

Timeline for Apostrophes and s’s

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Mar 31, 2013 at 15:21 comment added St John of the Cross @EdwinAshworth No, I haven't; but this question refers to using apostrophes, not leaving them out altogether!
Mar 31, 2013 at 15:08 comment added Edwin Ashworth @St John of the Cross: Either way? Perhaps you haven't been to St James Park (Exeter).
Mar 28, 2013 at 20:24 vote accept Celeritas
Mar 21, 2013 at 23:13 comment added tchrist You have to leave the St Jamie’s Park bit out, because that is a fossilized relic. And I really have heard people say Moses’s Laws so that it doesn’t sound like Moza’s Laws (whoever that is). I prefer saying the Laws of Moses myself, and sidestepping the issue altogether on that one.
Mar 21, 2013 at 23:08 comment added St John of the Cross Ye-es... one doesn't write or say Moses's. But St. James' Park can be written either way. And, indeed, pronounced according to the spelling (although James's is more usual, whatever the spelling).
Mar 21, 2013 at 23:03 comment added tchrist Actually, I contend that if it ends in -s, then whether to add an ’s to form the possessive is not a matter of style, but rather of pronunciation and underlying phonological rules that even native speakers are unaware of unless shown. It has to do with how no matter whether it is for pluralization or for forming possessives (A.K.A Saxon genitives), we only ever add one /əz/ inflection to a word, never two, and how this is blocked by words already ending in unstressed /iːz/.
Mar 21, 2013 at 22:55 comment added tchrist Ah yes, the nose knows: My nose is mine, thy nose is thine, your nose is yours, his nose is his, her nose is hers, their noses are theirs, and its nose is its. Just don’t tell Mitch.
Mar 21, 2013 at 22:50 history answered St John of the Cross CC BY-SA 3.0