OP is right to suspect active/passive has a bearing on preferred usage. From Google Books...
1: Active voice favours with...
The company replaced workers by machines - 3 results
The company replaced workers with machines - 405 results
2: Passive voice favours by...
Workers were replaced by machines - 280 results
Workers were replaced ...
The wording was delivered of was used in the official announcement at Buckingham Palace (image from the Press Association via BBC News):
3 a. To disburden (a woman) of the fœtus, to bring to childbirth; in pass., to give birth to a child or offspring. Rarely said of beasts. (The active is late and chiefly in obstetrical use.)
which is a use of ...
When talking about birth, to deliver does not (originally) mean to bring, like "the stork delivered the baby to us" or "UPS delivered the baby". Rather, it means to relieve (somebody of something) as in "deliver us!" or "seeking deliverance". So, the unborn baby is seen as a burden the mother has been carrying, and at birth she is relieved of, or delivered ...
Actually the answer is much simpler than those already provided. The mother is not the one doing the "delivering", that is the doctor.
So the doctor delivered the baby and the Duchess was "delivered of" the baby.
ᴛʟᴅʀ: Yes, this construction is perfectly grammatical* in English, and perfectly common as well. There are subtle restrictions on it, however, so not all such transforms produce things that sound right, or at least good, to a native speaker.
ɴᴏᴛᴇ 1: It requires preposition stranding, which some decry — but they’re wrong. :)ɴᴏᴛᴇ 2: Like Pullum, I won’t be ...
The simple expression I am humbled is full of emotional, relational, and cultural complexity with ancient connotations.
To some extent, saying I am humbled is tantamount to saying I am in touch with my humanity, because the English words humble and human seem to share the same Latin root humus:
mid-15c., humain, humaigne,
from Old French ...
If I throw a ball at someone; that is active.
Correct. Throw a ball is an active predicate.
If someone throws a ball at me - and it hits me in the face; that is passive.
Incorrect. Throw a ball is an active predicate (see above), and so is hit me in the face.
Active and Passive are grammatical terms in English that describe constructions; they don't ...
You can only form a passive out of a transitive verb. To stay when used transitively does not mean the same thing as used intransitively.
The word you might be looking for is lodged. People can be lodged in or at a hotel.
“He is wished to be here” is marginally grammatical, but in practise very unlikely.
Although he may be cast in the “object” case with an infinitival complement (I wish him to be here), it is not an actual object of the verb wish. It is actually the subject of the clause complementing wish, (I wish that he were here) and only formally ...
All of these participial usages are examples, as you suggested, of a syntactic rule that deletes a subject relative pronoun and an auxiliary be from a relative clause.
The rule is called Whiz-Deletion. The name is a mnemonic.
The Wh- part of Whiz-Deletion comes from the fact that relative pronouns start with wh-.
The -iz part of Whiz-Deletion comes from ...
There is a long discussion in the Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (p1441-1443) of the typical contexts in which the get-passive is more likely than the be-passive. The CGEL notes that:
i Get-passives tend to be avoided in formal style,
ii Get-passives are found only with dynamic verbs,
iii Get-passives are more conducive to an agentive ...
The usage you question is definitely a usage that is frequently criticized. "Grammar Girl" Mignon Fogarty writes:
most grammar sources I checked (2, 3, 4) agree that ‘is comprised of’ is an incorrect phrase.
She cites many of the usual suspects in schoolmarm-style prescriptive rules of this sort: Garner's Modern American Usage, Bryson’s Dictionary for ...
Both are possible, grammatical, and idiomatic, but "my email ID has changed" simply means that the ID is no longer the same, while "my email ID has been changed" puts more stress on the fact that someone is responsible for actively changing the ID.
The question touches on several issues. Stated as it is, there's no single answer.
However, many of the issues touched on are fairly well understood.
First, terminology. Passive refers to a syntactic process only. It does not refer to meaning.
Consequently one cannot "express the Passive voice by means of the active voice". Or by any means.
Passive is ...
Quit is not really transitive with the noun job; it's too intimately linked with its object, and that object is usually an Object Complement clause, because the normal meaning is to stop performing some activity permanently, or at least for some time. (There are also Subject Complements, but not in this example.)
He quit smoking.
There is also an economic ...
Besides tchrist's suggestion of lodged, you could also say
Passengers can be sent to their destination on a different flight or be housed at a hotel.
(In this instance, house has the definition of: to give shelter to; harbor; lodge
Or you could say:
Passengers can be sent to their destination on a different flight or be put up in a hotel.
Or you ...
The first site is wrong:
He has been being treated for imbecility for almost twenty years and has not yet recovered his wits.
In 2007 he had been being treated for imbecility for ten years and had not yet recovered his wits.
He will be being treated for imbecility on Monday when you arrive, and may not be able to greet you.
By then he will have been ...
Quiet is a predicate adjective, and almost all predicate adjectives are intransitive. Passive can only apply to a transitive predicate.
Be is an auxiliary verb, required to hold the tense for the predicate adjective; no auxiliary verb ever governs Passive. Indeed, the Passive construction uses be itself.
Short answer: Yes, it's fine. Totally fine.
If you're interested:
It's the progressive passive; a combination of the progressive aspect and the passive voice. It does have a subject, which is lasers. But being passive the subject is the patient rather than the agent of the verb.
There're two passive forms in English.
Lasers are used.
Lasers are being used.
I don't know why someone downvoted, 39 - I'm having quite a job finding corroboration in online dictionaries for the following.
Some verbs in English have a dual usage, where a transitive usage may be switched to an intransitive one, the direct object becoming the subject:
Bill closed the door - the door closed
Phil broke the window - the window ...
There is nothing grammatically incorrect about
His room is being painted by John.
However it doesn't carry the exact same meaning as
John is painting his room.
The first (passive) means that John is painting someone else's room, where as the second (active) could mean that, but it's more likely that it means that John is painting his own room.
The mistake is believing that "intransitive" is an invariant property of verbs.
Transitivity is a property of clauses, not of verbs. Many verbs cannot be used alone in a transitive clause, and therefore transitivizing prepositions are used to make them transitive. These prepositions don't even have their usual meaning -- they're just crutches used to ...
I think it would be best to avoid trying to talk about meaning in terms of voice at all. It's confusing, like talking about time reference in terms of "tense", because people often use terms like "voice" and "tense" to refer to purely morphological categories. I would advise only using the term "voice" to talk about the morphological form of verbs, since ...
"The channel is being built with the aid of the latest technologies available today."
"Is being built," "has been built," "will be built," etc. are all passive forms. "Build" is active: (a subject) may build (an object).
In his ‘Oxford Modern English Grammar’, Aarts is less dogmatic, commenting that ‘not all verbs allow passivization to the same extent’, and gives as an example Tony likes films with lots of gratuitous violence. Certainly, Films with lots of gratuitous violence are liked by Tony is at best odd.
‘The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English’ includes ...
There are two styles of passive. We can have long passives which mention the agent:
I was robbed by a clown.
Or we can have short passives that don't tell us who the agent is at all:
I was robbed.
Whether you use an active or passive sentence will depend primarily on two factors. The first is which entities in your sentence have already been mentioned ...
Syntactically, yes, the sentence is correct. It's the Passive Future Progressive.
The direct derivation is:
Michael will be drinking water. >>> Water will be being drunk by
But the real question is, what do you want to mean by it, and in what situation?
You would have to be referring to a particular moment or point in time in the future. ...