Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 3036

This tag is for questions about formal (versus informal) words and usage. The question must identify a particular concern about the formality of the word or phrase at issue, and specify the target context or audience.

7 votes
Accepted

Is using "have" better than using "got" in the following sentence?

"Have" is correct and can be only one thing: I possess/hold/etc. the file. "Got" can be two things: I've got the file: has the same meaning as "I have the file", but is somewhat informal; if you le …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
8 votes

Usage of "is when"

There are two questions you could ask: 1. is this acceptable?, and 2. if not, why not? It is fine in casual writing, but it may not be appropriate in formal writing; it sounds a bit too informal for …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
11 votes
Accepted

Is using "and/or" recommended for formal writing, or is it frowned upon?

I believe most style books advise against using and/or in formal writing. By "formal" I mean in newspapers or novels. If space is extremely limited, most writers would have no qualms about it, as in d …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

"TV": is it formal or informal?

It is somewhat more informal than television, but not very much so; while I'd certainly prefer television in most written texts, I'd not be shocked at reading TV either, perhaps not even in a scientif …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
14 votes

Were contractions less common in olden days?

[Edited] What is contraction? In all languages I know, there is a general tendency to contract existing words in speech. I will comment on contraction in writing later. The cause of contraction in …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Starting a Sentence with a Conjunction

Coördinating conjunctions, such as and, or and but, can be used to begin a new sentence. This was already widely accepted in Fowler's time, and probably always. There is nothing wrong with the conjunc …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
35 votes
Accepted

Is "misconfigured" a word?

Mis- is a productive prefix, so I see no reason why it should not be allowed to form new verbs, unless used instead of a better word if such exists. The OED agrees: As now apprehended, the prefix …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
24 votes
5 answers
7k views

Does America have its Versions of U- and Non-U English?

In Britain and most of Europe, some form of U-speak exists: old-money language has certain features that distinguish it from other language. In Dutch, it doesn't really have a name, but it is still ve …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
60 votes

Did English ever have a formal version of "you"?

It seems Middle English developed the distinction between formal (you) and informal (thou) versions: this distinction did not exist in Old English. The formal pronoun you was originally a plural form …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar
22 votes
Accepted

What's the difference between "informal", "colloquial", "slang", and "vulgar"?

There are various degrees of (in)formality: it is usually not a yes–no distinction. … So this is about different languages, not merely different registers or levels of formality. …
Cerberus - Reinstate Monica's user avatar