I understand it should be
How does it compare
because the do has stole the s, but what is the reasoning behind it? I don't want to make the same mistake twice, so I feel I need to understand the reasoning.
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI understand it should be
How does it compare
because the do has stole the s, but what is the reasoning behind it? I don't want to make the same mistake twice, so I feel I need to understand the reasoning.
Because, as with can or should, do is a modal verb, and as such it is always followed by a verb in its basic form: basic form being the verb without the introducing to.
Compare can be transitive or intransitive.
Transitive, identifying differences:
John compared the two books and choose the larger
Intransitive, be comparable
The larger book just didn't compare with the little one