I understand it should be
How does it compare
because the do has stole the s, but what is the reasoning behind it? I don't want to make the same mistake twice, so I feel I need to understand the reasoning.
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Because, as with can or should, do is a modal verb, and as such it is always followed by a verb in its basic form: basic form being the verb without the introducing to.