I'd be glad if someone could tell me how numbers like "" are read (pronounced)? "Two dot three dot four..." or "two three four" or maybe "two point three point four"?

  • It depends wholly on speaker and context, which vary by the phase of the moon and the solar wind. You cannot get a single right answer here. You can get no more than a survey of what various people might say.
    – tchrist
    Jan 11, 2013 at 12:37
  • 1
    This has been asked before, but I can't locate the question. Perhaps someone else can. Jan 11, 2013 at 12:37
  • @tchrist so doest that mean I can read them whatever I want? :)
    – Nik
    Jan 11, 2013 at 12:39
  • 1
    Related: Name for number format used in "Section 3.2.1"
    – tchrist
    Jan 11, 2013 at 12:50
  • 2
    The two standard ways to read them are by saying point or dot for the (.), but not both. If you don't include one of those words & say only two-three-four-five-six-etc., you might confuse the listener.
    – user21497
    Jan 11, 2013 at 12:51

2 Answers 2


The generally accepted and correct pronunciation of would be:

Two point three point four point five point six.

The term point comes from full point as used as a punctuation mark or full stop. From Oxford English Dictionary (OED):

point, n.1

a. A full stop (in full, full point);

  • And 2.13 as two point thirteen, not as the decimal number two point one three.
    – Andrew Leach
    Jan 11, 2013 at 14:55
  • @AndrewLeach Yes, good point! Sorry couldn't resist. Jan 11, 2013 at 14:57
  • @spiceyokooko Would you please point to a source?
    – Tin Man
    Mar 31, 2018 at 12:19

It seems that there isn't consensus on a single term to use.

In another post here on StackExchange, Dan Sheppard writes:

The word you use -- "dot", "point", "mark", "sub", -- is a matter of personal taste or else institutional style, but when in doubt a word which directly describes the symbol is usually fine (I would say point here).

Version numbers carry a similar ambiguity. Both the terms "dot release" and "point release" are valid, and version numbers can be read in a variety of ways. In the case of "Web 2.0," for example, both "dot" and "point" can be used:

There seem to be many possible ways of saying this - "two point oh", "two point zero", "two dot oh", two point nought", "two oh", "web two" - with a certain amount of variation according to nationality, company loyalties and other factors.

  • In the specific case of version numbers, in my personal experience as a software engineer I also often hear the point omitted entirely — for example, reading version 1.2.3 as “one two three”. Given that software collaboration is so often remote and text-based, I wonder if there is regional variation in the spoken pronunciation.
    – Thom Smith
    Apr 21, 2019 at 17:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.