What is the opposite for the straight talk idiom? How do I best call the activity when someone makes a very long preamble before he says what he wants?
In the noble spirit of one immortal orator when he so colorfully advised our hero . . .
This business is well ended.
My liege, and madam, to expostulate
What majesty should be, what duty is,
Why day is day, night night, and time is time,
Were nothing but to waste night, day and time.
Therefore, since brevity is the soul of wit,
And tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes,
I will be brief: your noble son is mad:
Mad call I it; for, to define true madness,
What is’t but to be nothing else but mad?
But let that go.
. . . I can myself do little less than recommend vigorously not timorously, for timor no more profits a man than it does a mouse or a moth, any of the following fine and splendid formulations of art:
and of course, my personal favorite word for vexing prattlers wont to sacrifice wit’s soul on the altar of florid flourish:
If you are actually talking about someone who waffles on long-windedly before getting to the point (rather than someone who doesn’t say things straight out and honestly, which is how I too would understand ‘straight talk’), the first idiom that comes to mind is beating around the bush.
The opposite of a familiar and straightforward idiom would be a strange and impenetrable circumlocution. I suggest "obfuscatory tergiversation."
I'd suggest pussyfoot for the specific use you mentioned. In other uses, I might say an antonym for straight talk would be euphemism or the vulgar B.S. even.
The opposite of straight is crooked (the adjective /'krʊkəd/, not the past participle /krʊkt/).
The opposite of talking is thinking, in the sense that what one says may not represent what one thinks. Particularly when the topic is lying.
So I'd say the opposite of straight talk would be crooked thinking.
Last year the question Word for a person who talks without content was closed as a duplicate of this one. While I believe that my answer works for this question, I believe that it works even better for that one. The answer is double-talk.
- language that appears to be earnest and meaningful but in fact is a mixture of sense and nonsense
- inflated, involved, and often deliberately ambiguous language
- language that uses many words but has very little meaning
another term for doublespeak
Deliberately euphemistic, ambiguous, or obscure language.
‘the art of political doublespeak’
empty, deceptive, or ambiguous talk, esp by politicians
a way of saying things that makes it impossible for people to understand, used by people in official positions when they want to hide the truth
grammar.about.com discusses doublespeak:
Doublespeak is language that's intended to deceive or confuse people. …
Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms, unsupported generalizations, or deliberate ambiguity. Contrast with plain English.
William Lutz has defined doublespeak as “language which pretends to communicate but doesn’t.”
The grammar.about.com page referenced above lists many other terms, phrases, and references that relate to these questions, such as
Amusing Contemporary Notes:
- The reference for drivel is a link to an article on George Carlin’s Essential Drivel, which, amidst a long string of “superfluous redundant pleonastic tautologies,” mentions “over-exaggerating,” which was recently popularized by an Olympic athlete.
- Why You’ll Never Be Told, “You’re Fired” links to a page that leads with a photograph of Donald Trump.