4

Generally speaking, attach too much significance to [something] can be replaced overvalue, but that doesn't sit well with me in certain contexts.

For example, suppose I reached some conclusion after considering various factors, but it turns out later that I accorded too much weight to "Factor X" (causing me to reach the wrong conclusion).

"I attached/ascribed/assigned/etc. too much significance to X" conveys exactly what I want to say. I can't explain why "I overvalued X" doesn't cut it for me - that's just the way it is.

Words such as overstate, overplay, overemphasise all seem to imply I focused too much on X in a debate attempting to defend my (erroneous) conclusion. And overestimate implies mistakenly thinking X was bigger than it really was (rather than just "more important than it should be").

Ideally, I'm looking for "I xxxx'ed X", but even "I xxxx'ed the importance of X" would do.

Improve this question
5
  • ... overestimated the significance of ... is a permutation you don't seem to have stated, but the expression you mention first works well for me.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Dec 30 '12 at 16:35
  • Injudicious is possible, but is more to do with judgement than overvalue.
    – spiceyokooko
    Dec 30 '12 at 16:56
  • @spiceyokooko: I might (just about) have formed an injudicious opinion, but I can't see how any word based on that concept could be used to describe my erroneous treatment of Factor X.
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 30 '12 at 17:08
  • 1
    If refragatory ("Disposed to controvert or refute", OED) weren't obsolete, it would give an easy solution; eg “I subrefragatorized X”.
    – James Waldby - jwpat7
    Dec 30 '12 at 18:59
  • No it wouldn't.
    – Edwin Ashworth
    Dec 30 '12 at 22:31
4

You can overrate something or overrate the importance of something.

Overrate:

have a higher opinion of (someone or something) than is deserved

Improve this answer
4

How about overweight?

overweight :To place excessive weight or emphasis on; to overestimate the importance of

Improve this answer
1
  • I can't deny that this one should be exactly the word I need. But it's a highly-specialised usage that would normally be swamped by other connotations. So I'll upvote, but I don't think I'll be "accepting" this.
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 30 '12 at 18:27
1

Overemphasize — "to place too much emphasis on or employ too much emphasis".

That's what you did in your example at least.

Improve this answer
3
  • But again this seems more akin to overstate, overplay - as if I've made too much of Factor X when trying to convince other people.
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 30 '12 at 20:11
  • And OP has specifically listed and discounted this word in his question.
    – Jim
    Dec 30 '12 at 21:32
  • 1
    @Jim: Perhaps Chris thought I wouldn't notice because of the different spelling (luckily, I'm wise, not yet wizened! :)
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 30 '12 at 22:46
1

I exaggerated the importance of X.
I ennobled X.
I aggrandized X.

Are some suggestions, if you want to avoid the over- prefix.

Improve this answer
1
  • ennobling sounds a bit weird to me - but to me, the others imply defective presentation of an argument. I know in order to make a decision I have to "argue" with myself, but I want something implying I was fooled [by myself], rather than I fooled [anyone, perhaps myself]
    – FumbleFingers
    Dec 31 '12 at 0:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.