I'm writing the following sentence:

Women lead uptake at XX%.

But a friend is saying that it should be written:

Women lead uptake with XX%.

Which one is correct?

  • 2
    I barely understand either without some context. I guess this is a headline: the grammar of headlines is different from English grammar (hardly any articles are needed, for example). I think both are equally unclear, partly because it gives no hint what the percentage is of: of people, of women, of potential taker-uppers, of instances of whatever it is that is being taken up? – Colin Fine Jan 21 '11 at 15:52
  • 1
    I agree, I'd like some context. For example: why is there no article before uptake? – Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica Jan 21 '11 at 18:06
  • English is not my native language actually so I'm struggling a bit with this. – Carlos G. Jan 26 '11 at 5:24

Use 'with' if you are reporting the percentage as a fraction of the whole. Use 'at' if you are reporting the percentage as a target or score.

"William won the school election, with 62% of the votes."

"The polls indicated that William's approval rating was at 73%."

| improve this answer | |

I would say 'with' is strictly correct: you are essentially shortening:

Women lead uptake with XX% of the total

That doesn't make sense with at:

Women lead uptake at XX% of the total

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    I think the "at" form is shortening "Women lead uptake because their uptake is are at XX% of whatever it is - like saying "Bill is the tallest at 7 feet"; clearly "with" in the last sentence would have a very different meaning :-) – psmears Jan 21 '11 at 17:45
  • @Psmears: Perhaps we could analyse it as "being at [the point/level of]"? It is then a non-defining attribute. – Cerberus_Reinstate_Monica Jan 21 '11 at 17:57

"with" means "By the means of" "at" means "in or near the location of" i would use "by".buy an economics newspaper tomorrow. You can see a whole page of examples.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    Without context we can't really know, but "lead by 10%" would have a very different meaning from "lead with 10%": the first would mean that they're 10% ahead; the second would mean that they have 10% (of whatever it is), but we don't know whether the runner-up has 0%, 9.99%, or anything in between :) – psmears Jan 21 '11 at 18:31
  • can you please show me an example of "...with (percentage)". Maybe some article from a native writer. thanks – Fiona Cheung Jan 22 '11 at 10:39
  • @Fiona Cheung: blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2011/03/… - first sentence. – Optimal Cynic Jul 5 '11 at 19:16
  • Antony Green’s blog post has moved here.  Also it’s in the Wayback Machine here. – Scott Aug 10 '18 at 6:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.