3

Hey, I'm watching a TV show, and there's a sentence:

I knew giving you that book was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.

Can I change it to:

I know gave you that book was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.

  • 2
    You can change it to that, but, it would be grammatically incorrect then... ;-) – Josh Jan 21 '11 at 3:46
4

No. The phrase "giving you that book" is the subject of the clause.

  • +1 The clause is "[Subject] was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.", where [Subject] is "giving you that book". – b.roth Jan 21 '11 at 11:55
6

I guess you are thinking that "knew giving" is some funny sort of compound verb, and wanting to move the past tense within it; but that's not how the sentence is structured. There is an omitted "that" (which can often be done in colloquial English), so the structure is:

"I knew [that [giving you that book] was ... ]"

0

I think most of us are inclined to say that "gave" makes the sentence ungrammatical. However, from a linguistic standpoint, we probably all understood what was meant, so it doesn't really matter which is used.

  • If I met the second sentence without the context of the first sentence to explain it, I would have a very hard time figuring out what was going on. Also I am very opposed to the idea that "as long as it's understandable it doesn't matter if it's 'right' or not." Saying it right makes it much more understandable. – Hellion Jun 6 '11 at 3:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.