3

Consider the following examples:

You have to be really patient if you are to go shopping in the afternoon.
It must be active if it is to record the film.

What is the construction in bold typeface called and should it be used in formal English texts — is it good or bad style?

5

It's the Be + Infinitive Construction, if you need a name. The construction is not limited to infinitive use; i.e, it's not just to be to + Infinitive. It can also be used in the present or past tense.

  • He is to leave tomorrow.
  • He was to leave yesterday, but the flight was cancelled.

A bare infinitive in a strange place, like after an auxiliary verb (e.g, be or have), is bound to be an idiom, and usually has a modal meaning:

  • He has to leave. (He must leave)
  • He is to leave (He will leave ~ He is expected/scheduled to leave)

just like relative infinitives (infinitive clauses modifying nouns) always have a modal meaning:

  • He is the man to see about this. (He is the man that one should see)
  • He is the man to do the job. (He is the man who should do it)
  • Thanks, that makes sense. Still, my main concern was whether this was formal English in the stricter sense and fit for formal texts. – bitmask Dec 6 '12 at 15:00
  • 1
    Yes, it's formal English. Any time you're talking about a schedule, you're being formal. – John Lawler Dec 6 '12 at 16:26
  • I agree, of course. But the question is not right: there is no to-be-to construction. – Lambie May 21 '19 at 17:15
  • The questions are almost never right. There are usually false presuppositions that go uncorrected. Life is short and this service is free. – John Lawler May 21 '19 at 19:51
0

If "He has to leave" is idiomatic, what is "He doesn't have to leave"? "Have to" plus bare infinitive is perfectly grammatical, I believe, especially after defective verbs.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.