In words such as salad /sæləd/, you have a VCV pattern (vowel-consonant-vowel), in which the first vowel is short. The syllable division of such words is generally done after the consonant, i.e, as VC-V. Here are a few examples:

salad /sæl-əd/
lemon /lem-ən/
never /nev-ər/
balance /bæl-əns/

This division is in agreement with the notion that generally, a short vowel do not end a syllable.

Cambridge and the American Heritage dictionaries divide these words this way. Also, phonics and spelling textbooks do the same. However, Merriam-Webster dictionaries, such as the Collegiate and the Unabridged, divide these words before the consonant. So you have:

salad /sæ-ləd/
lemon /le-mən/
never /ne-vər/
balance /bæ-ləns/

I would like to ask why there is such a disagreement between the dictionaries, and which division is natural for you. You may want to mention whether your English is American, British or other.

  • 2
    Determining why different dictionaries do things differently is not under the purview of this site.
    – Robusto
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 16:08
  • 4
    @Robusto: The reason for which English dictionaries do things differently may be explained through the history and characteristics of the English language. On the other hand, the fact that English dictionaries do things differently my explain phenomena of the English language.
    – Bohoo
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 16:24
  • "[T]he fact that English dictionaries do things differently [may] explain phenomena of the English language": can you explain that hypothesis, and what you are hoping to learn about the language from such an exercise?
    – Robusto
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 16:34
  • 1
    @Robusto: When you are learning a subject, it is of a value to be exposed to different treatments of it by different scholars. Dictionaries do a lot of things differently, and some of these differences can definitely teach us somethings about English Language and Usage.
    – Bohoo
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 19:19
  • 1
    I am astonished this question was closed. What could be more interesting and relevant to a site about the English language than a good question about ambiguous syllable division! The fact that the question originated from inspecting dictionaries seems hardly relevant.
    – nohat
    Commented Dec 15, 2012 at 2:23

4 Answers 4


Syllable division in English is very complicated, and almost none of the dictionaries do it right. At least, according to John Wells, one of the experts on the subject (I assume he believes his own dictionary, the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, gets it correct. See also this blog entry of his.)

Simplifying Wells' argument drastically, I believe he is saying that in these cases, if the first syllable is stressed, the consonant affects the length of the previous vowel (e.g., high tens and heightens are pronounced differently). Thus, if the first syllable is stressed, the consonant should go with the first syllable.

  • Did you take into account larger values of 10?
    – Robusto
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 16:35
  • You might be right regarding Wells. It will be of a value if one can confirm that in the Longman Pronunciation Dictionary these words are divided VC-V.
    – Bohoo
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 18:53
  • Dunno about tens but 2 + 2 = 5 for large values of 2.
    – MetaEd
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 19:21
  • 2
    @Bohoo, yes, I confirm that in LPD-3 (Wells 2008) "salad", "lemon", "balance", and "never" are divided CVC-V(C).
    – Alex B.
    Commented Dec 15, 2012 at 2:35

Since you ask about personal use:

  • In my speech, the consonant heads the following syllable: ne - ver, ba - lance. This is my idiolect, which is basically educated East Alabama speech; and it was confirmed by my speech instructors when I was a student of acting.

  • In writing, however, if I were compelled to hyphenate such a word at the end of a line of text, I would place the hyphen after the consonant, because leaving the bare vowel at the end of a line would lead the reader to expect a word in which it is long. (With such short words, however, I would make every effort to avoid hyphenation.)

It would not surprise me to find that it is just such conflicting uses which leads to the disagreement between dictionaries.

  • 2
    I'm not really clear on what you mean by "in my speech" there. It seems to me that in my speech there's no meaningful division that associates the middle consonant more strongly with either the preceding or the following syllable. It only becomes an issue if you're writing it, in some context where you either need to hyphenate, or to separate the syllables so you can indicate which one is stressed. In effect, it seems to be just a matter of orthography to me. Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 16:53
  • 1
    @FumbleFingers Consider, however, the singer — in “Somewhere over the rainbow” (in the originally published key of C — Garland sang it in G), is the /v/ included in the B, or does it start the G? The actor speaking Lear’s “Never, never, never, never, never” faces the same problem. Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 18:01
  • Wells argued that only coda /t/ can be flapped in AmE. Do you really not flap /t/ in e.g. better (assuming Wells's description matches your idiolect)? Another argument against the syllabifications /nɛ.vψ̩/ and /ˈbæ.lən(t)s/ is that they put /æ/ and /ɛ/ in open syllables, which (except in a few interjections) is phonotactically forbidden otherwise. Do you have words that end in /æ/ or /ɛ/? Commented Dec 12, 2012 at 3:50
  • @Mechanicalsnail I can't think of any -Cæ or -Cɛ words. But if I get real down-home, I diphthongalize actual closed syllables: the name ‘Bev’ is /bɛəv/ or even / bɛjəv/; ‘Hal’ is something like /hæəl/, almost /hæʊ/. And in fact in ordinary rapid speech, the medial consonant in balance almost disappears; it’s almost /bæʊnts/. Commented Dec 15, 2012 at 4:09
  • @Mechanicalsnail As for the /t/ in *better*—I'm not entirely clear what Wells is describing, but mine's deaspirated and somewhat voiced. Commented Dec 15, 2012 at 4:25

I am undercertain whether you asking about syllables, or about hyphenation, or both, but as far as hyphenation is concerned, the standard Knuth–Liang hyphenation algorithm (used not only by TeX but by many other pieces of software) says that one should hyphenate those four words this way:

  • sal·ad
  • lemon
  • nev·er
  • bal·ance

Yes, that’s right: they say you should not hyphenate lemon at all. On the other hand, Bringhurst’s first rule of hyphenation, located on page 42 of version 3.2 of The Elements of Typographic Style, says that:

2.4.1   At hyphenated line-ends, leave at least two characters behind and take at least three forward.

Fi-nally is conventionally acceptable line-end hyphenation, but final-ly is not, because it takes too little of the word forward.

Therefore according to Bringhurst, only bal-ance is acceptable from your initial set, since it is the only one that carries at least three letters forward.

How hyphenation aligns with perceived syllabication, however, is a more complex matter.

  • My question is about syllables, but since hyphenation and syllable division are not unrelated, I will see if learning more about hyphenation will illuminate this issue.
    – Bohoo
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 18:36

Does it really matter? I think that, whether or I say nev·ər, or ne·vər, once it's put together and spoken as a two-syllable word, it's going to come out as the same nevər, irrespective of where I might divide the word – if I can even discern where the syllables might happen to be separated, and that might not be so easy to figure out. Truth be told, it's something I don't think about, it's something I would have trouble determining, and it doesn't effect how I pronounce words like these.

The only time I've ever been concerned about the proper division of such words has been when I've needed to hyphenate one. Then, I've simply consulted a dictionary.

If different dictionaries show different breaks, then I suppose you could hyphenate the word in either place.

M-W's online dictionary entry for lemon is interesting, in that it shows the word broken into syllables between the m and o, yet its pronunciation guide shows a break between the e and m:

enter image description here

It's hard to tell if that's intentional (and, if so, what that means), or if that's just evidence that M-W is a lemon of a dictionary. For what it's worth, HM's American Heritage is more consistent in this matter:

enter image description here

  • 1
    I think you’ve correctly identified that this syllabication quest is a useless wild goose chase with no meaning or applicability.
    – tchrist
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 20:04
  • 1
    It might matter when you learn or teach English pronunciation.The way people actually divide words into syllables is part of the phonetics of the language. Besides, if it didn't matter, dictionaries wouldn't indicate it, and many studies regarding how people actually divide words wouldn't be conducted.
    – Bohoo
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 20:36
  • @Bohoo: Please don't mis·in·ter·pret what I am say·ing. I un·der·stand that most words have clear·ly de·lin·e·at·ed syl·la·bles. But you spe·cif·i·cal·ly asked a·bout words that are so hard to de·ter·mine how the words are di·vid·ed, e·ven the dic·tion·ar·ies don't a·gree! In those ca·ses, the di·vi·sions are much more ar·bi·trar·y. You asked, "Which di·vi·sions are more nat·u·ral for you?" I an·swered can·did·ly: I don't know, I can't tell, and it has no ef·fect on how I pro·nounce those words. But my an·swer is·n't meant to im·ply that syl·lab·i·fi·ca·tion is never rel·e·vant.
    – J.R.
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 21:22
  • @Bohoo: BTW, I've written about syllabification on ELU before. Once again, my answer here isn't meant to say that syllabification "doesn't matter," or isn't part of language. But one dictionary might say le·mon, and another lem·on, and I wouldn't call either one "wrong." I'd simply say, "Yes, that is a tricky one to figure out; it can be broken in either place."
    – J.R.
    Commented Dec 1, 2012 at 21:36
  • 1
    Syllabification can be important in English. Consider the pronunciation difference between White·stone and Whites·tone—there's a substantial difference there. The difference between lem·on and le·mon is much smaller. In another question on this site, I realized that I say wait·ress and many other people say wai·tress (although I think John Wells argues it's waitr·ess). I never noticed this difference until it came up in the comments there. Commented Dec 8, 2012 at 15:20

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.