If I want to use lead to, does it always need to use being as shown below.
less number of points lead to missing edges being occurred, are recognized using proximity analysis.
If I want to use lead to, does it always need to use being as shown below.
less number of points lead to missing edges being occurred, are recognized using proximity analysis.
One possible way to phrase your sentence(the complete one posted in the comments) using "lead to" is:
Proximity analysis recognizes cases in which fewer points lead to missing edges.
There are obviously many other ways to rephrase the sentence such as:
Fewer points lead to cases where edges are missed; however, these are recognized by proximity analysis.
I personally prefer the former over the latter.