For instance, if I were to describe someone as being *near-*carnivorous, I'm have the goal of depicting them as being a heavy meat eater that includes very few forms of non-meat based food in their diet as opposed to being one who exclusively consumes meat.

  • 3
    You would have to use an adverb like largely or mostly — or near. – Robusto Oct 23 '12 at 15:39

I'm very much in favour of quasi- for this purpose, but near serves the purpose, as does mostly.

Quasi- used to show that something is almost, but not completely, the thing described http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/quasi?q=quasi

  • Yes, but in some contexts I quite like the "suffix" XXX manqué for someone/something that doesn't quite make the grade as an XXX. – FumbleFingers Oct 23 '12 at 16:41
  • 1
    Perhaps, but quasi is often used negatively in my experience. If the intent is to show that quasicarnivorous is not as good as carnivorous then this works. I think semi is more neutral but certainly does not indicate 'mostly'. – fredsbend Apr 5 '13 at 7:45

The prefix peri- may suit

enclosing, encircling, or around ⇒ pericardium, pericarp, perigon
near or adjacent ⇒ perihelion

  • 1
    peri is more physical location than state of being. Peri is largely used in the medical field because it is a prefix to describe location. – fredsbend Apr 5 '13 at 7:35

"semi: a Latin prefix to a verb, noun, or adjective meaning 'half'".

Even though it means half, it is often used in context to mean "almost", especially in cases when it is applied to non-measurable concepts. Some examples are "semi-automatic firearm", "semi-parasitic creature", or "semi-arid climate".

I think that "pseudo-" could work in the context of "near carnivorous". Pseudo means "false" or "mock", so it would not work in all cases as "near". But "pseudo-carnivorous" for some reason sounds more natural to me than "semi-carnivorous".


I think para- comes closest, when used in the sense of resembling or similar, as in para-military, para-medic or para-legal.

Others you might consider in particular contexts are quasi- and crypto-.

  • 2
    There are too many other senses of para- for this to be of much use. Also, the para in paralegal means subsidiary to, not "nearly" a lawyer. – Robusto Oct 23 '12 at 15:43
  • 1
    @Robusto I disagree with your first point; the first time I heard the term paramedic, I understood what it must mean based on my understanding of paramilitary and so on. It was clear that the other meanings were inappropriate. I also contest your second point; paralegal may mean a person assisting a lawyer, but the para- in paralegal does not mean subsidiary to; it is using the meaning of para- as "near or alongside", because the paralegal is an auxilliary. para- does not have a meaning of "subsidiary to". – itsbruce Oct 23 '12 at 15:52

According to Wikipedia, English has borrowed presque-isle from the French, to mean a peninsula with an unusually narrow neck. However, this seems to be the sole use of this prefix in English - so far.

Carnivorous is essentially a non-gradable (because it classifies) adjective. To get round this fact to describe an animal eating say 98% meat, one could use the construction 'almost exclusively carnivorous'.


While not a prefix, your instance appears to perfectly describe obligate carnivores.

Besides quasi (which I like), you can also consider the prefix cis- which is from Latin cis 'on this side of'.


Why not pen-, as in penultimate or peninsula?

  • 1
    I do not believe pen- to be a productive prefix in English. Penultimate and peninsula were borrowed in toto from Latin. – MetaEd Jan 25 '13 at 3:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.