4

I have disabled something and want to enable it again. Can I say that I "re-enable it" or do I simply "enable" it?

1
  • 7
    Go ahead and reenable it. It's not doing you any good the way it is.
    – Robusto
    Sep 27 '12 at 1:29
4

If it was enabled at some point in the past, then you can re-enable it.

Technically if it was never enabled before and you turn it on for the first time, you shouldn't call that "re-enabling", but I doubt anybody would really care to split that hair if it's something that's likely to be flipped back and forth on any sort of frequent basis.

3
  • 1
    And then I can re-disable it.
    – gam3
    Sep 27 '12 at 2:00
  • 1
    You could "re-disable" it, but I doubt that most native speakers would use that term. We'd just say "disable" it. Because it's a toggle, most speakers would probably say "enable/disable" in most contexts. A Google search for "re-disable" shows only "re-enable/disable" in the first 100 hits. NGRAM viewer shows no BrE or AmE hits between 1800 & 2008.
    – user21497
    Sep 27 '12 at 2:24
  • 3
    Nobody will split that hair. I've refrigerated many things that have never been frigerated. Sep 27 '12 at 6:28
0

If it is a simple toggle switch, I would employ either enable, restore or reinstate.

When dealing with a trigger device that would not come on immediately, I would rather use arm or rearm.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.