4

With modern high divorce rates, a lot of people get married more than once in their lives. Saying "my ex-wife's new husband" is a bit awkward. Is there anything more graceful?

I came across it in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqXGxLWPWMQ. They proposed "ex-in-law" and "outlaw", mostly in jest.

9
  • 11
    "Your replacement"
    – jwodder
    Sep 9, 2012 at 23:49
  • 4
    Outlaws are the people who would be your inlaws had you made an honest woman of your girlfriend.
    – MetaEd
    Sep 10, 2012 at 0:09
  • 1
    @JLG - true, undoubtedly. But if the first husband referred to his replacement as "my second husband", I suspect people would get the wrong idea.
    – user16269
    Sep 10, 2012 at 4:27
  • 1
    'Her latest squeeze'? Sep 10, 2012 at 7:05
  • 1
    "My step-me". Which can be elaborated to "my wicked step-me" if you wish.
    – Hot Licks
    May 14, 2017 at 13:05

3 Answers 3

5

No, there isn't.

This sort of kinship relation is relatively new to Anglophone cultures, and there are really no established norms to follow. It takes centuries for terms like this to populate the language and its culture.

Really, you have two options -- or more correctly, a mix of the two:

  1. explain the nature of the relation (once) to anyone who's that interested in it
  2. make up a relation(al term) that will pass under people's radar, and stick to it.

Counterpartner is a reasonable and logical relational term, which unfortunately means that nobody's ever heard of it, and likely won't understand it.

But maybe it'll make them ask, if that's what you want.

3
  • I agree: I think my ex's new spouse would be much more understandable than my counterpartner, and it doesn't even add an extra syllable.
    – J.R.
    Sep 10, 2012 at 8:25
  • 2
    'Anglophone' --> 'most'
    – Mitch
    Sep 10, 2012 at 12:36
  • True, but this is an English language question. Sep 10, 2012 at 14:43
5

If you don't want to be friendly, then my daughter’s stepfather might fit the bill [substitute appropriate offspring as necessary]. Why mention the ex-wife/partner at all?

1
  • 1
    Actually, this doesn't need to be unfriendly; this could be used matter-of-factly as well. I can think of contexts where this would work rather nicely.
    – J.R.
    Sep 11, 2012 at 2:19
3

Try counterpartner. This article from a site supporting blended or bonus families is written from the woman's perspective relating to the other wife/mother, but I see no reason why counterpartner can't be applied to the ex-husband relating to the new husband/father. However counterpartner doesn't appear in dictionaries yet.

Note also the bonus term bonus mom, which is probably a friendlier way to distinguish between the biological mother and the new mom (a.k.a. stepmother), and from which bonus dad could be extrapolated.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.