I've read many times recently that Michael Phelps is double-jointed. The term is totally misleading because it suggests that someone with this condition has twice as many joints as others have. Actually, the term double-jointed is connected to something called Hypermobility and means only that the joints can stretch farther than normal.

I wondered whether the word 'double' refers to the extent or degree of something in this context (not quantity), i.e. perhaps the joints can be stretched twice as much.

How come they call it double-jointed?

  • Don't take things so literally. Saying 'really flexible' just doesn't have the same oomph.
    – Mitch
    Aug 13, 2012 at 13:38
  • 3
    Ok sure. The question just popped into my mind because there was a specific example here in Hungary. This term was literally mistranslated and I was kind of surprised. Plus I'd like to know its origin. Aug 13, 2012 at 13:47

5 Answers 5


Sadly, the OED (through the 1987 Supplement) does not provide an etymology. My guess is that it is a metaphorical extension from joinery or mechanics. There are many sorts of double hinges (often called 'double-action hinges'); or it would be very natural to refer to what we now call a universal joint or U-joint as a 'double joint'. All of these are designed to provide a rotatory joint with more freedom of movement than normal: either more degrees of rotation about a single axis, or rotation about more than one axis, or both.


As I understand 'double-jointed' refers to the idea that such people have opposing joints, which allow them to "fold" their knees/elbows etc. in both directions with equal ease.

Naturally this isn't accurate as we know people considered to be double-jointed simply possess extremely flexible joints (or rather - ligaments) which allow them to stretch their appendages farther than most people.

  • does the downvoter care to comment?
    – Nieszka
    Aug 13, 2012 at 14:21
  • No idea who it was, but I think it's a good comment.
    – rsegal
    Aug 13, 2012 at 14:53

The OED’s definition is ‘Having joints that permit a much greater degree of movement of parts of the body than is normal’. The earliest supporting citation is from 1831. A citation from 1961 tells us that ‘Anatomists can only plead ignorance of the minor structural differences that must distinguish the normal joint from the double jointed variety.’


As someone who played with a ton of Lego, a double joint would account for flexibility in that way, but is obviously not a physiological answer in most cases.

My guess is that either the term originates from a mechanical analog, or a funky mutation in which someone actually has more joints. That's entirely speculative, but I've seen much, much stranger mutations.


It means bending in two directions.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.