10

In part of the software my company develops, the user is presented with a list of black-and-white images. The user can select one of these images and then can select a color for it, changing it from black and white to the color they selected.

We are currently calling these “Colorizable Images”, as opposed to the alternative list of “Existing Color” images. But I am not sure that colorizable is a real word and am concerned people may not understand.

Is there a better term for something for which one can change the color of? We considered colorable but the definition seemed completely wrong.

An example might help. The user will see:

a black and white image

And when they choose to colorize that blue, they get:

a blue and white image

18
  • 1
    If you spelled "color" as "colour", then "colourable" might work. ;) Aug 8, 2012 at 20:31
  • 2
    A few dictionaries do have a second definition of colorable to mean what you want it to mean, like this one, and one of the sources cited here. Interesting what else that word can mean, though.
    – J.R.
    Aug 8, 2012 at 21:04
  • 1
    Looks to me like they merely colored it.
    – tchrist
    Aug 8, 2012 at 21:18
  • 2
    Re-colorable or recolorable might do; also, would uncolored mislead? Aug 8, 2012 at 21:49
  • 2
    I'm with @jwpat7. Recolorable and recolor are widely used words in graphics.
    – JLG
    Aug 9, 2012 at 1:54

11 Answers 11

11

Given that colorize is a verb that I've seen used in graphics editing software to apply color to greyscale images, and -able is a general English suffix meaning that something is capable of being done, I'd say that colorizable sounds like a perfectly good word to use.

1
  • Thanks, that was my thinking, but I wasn't sure and wanted to run it past others...
    – Josh
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:46
8

Why not simply use "customizable colour" or "custom coloured" images?

Do you need a single word?

1
  • 2
    I like "Custom Colored" images!
    – Josh
    Aug 9, 2012 at 1:19
6

"Colorizable" sounds awkwardly long. I would personally go for the simpler, "Colorable", or "Ready-to-color".

Depending on the context though you might be able to stretch out and use something like "Customizable" or call the images "Templates".

1
  • "Colorable"/"ready-to-color" suggest that you would be filling them in with color. Aug 9, 2012 at 10:38
1

What about coining a phrase such as hue-shift images? If you need to have the capable part emphasized, you could say hue-shiftable, but I like the simpler form.

If you are wed to the word color you could use color-shift or color-shiftable.

1

Maybe any-color images could work.

0
0

If you want to avoid colorable, then tintable is what you’re looking for.

5
  • No, it's way more than tinting. We're not coloring slightly, we're completely replacing the color.
    – Josh
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:27
  • 1
    It’s going to depend on your audience. Despite that definition, tinting does not necessarily connote “slightly”. Follow the link and check out the examples of usage on the right.
    – MetaEd
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:36
  • Our audience is graphic designers. They'll complain about "tinting"... I know them too well :-)
    – Josh
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:38
  • Ouch. That they will. I concede defeat.
    – MetaEd
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:41
  • Sorry! I appreciate the answer!
    – Josh
    Aug 8, 2012 at 20:46
0

This may be way off base, but what about calling them "line drawings"? Or "line drawn images"?

2
  • Sorry, my example was confusing. This example is a line drawing but not all of them are...
    – Josh
    Aug 8, 2012 at 21:27
  • Right, so the user can change the actual black of the image to a colour? Got it. Line drawings wouldn't work.
    – JAM
    Aug 8, 2012 at 21:38
0

Photoshop experts would say "overlayable".

1
  • 1
    I cannot do anything if photoshop experts woud say "overlayable" in situations like that! Aug 8, 2012 at 22:24
0

You could call these "Open color images" and "Closed color images". Otherwise, colorizable fits too since "Colorizable images" are images that can be colorized, which is the case.

-1

Colormorph is a more accurate descriptor and might appeal to techie consumers.

1
  • 2
    This answer is extremely short. It could be improved by citing relevant facts, references, or specific expertise which support the answer, or by going into more detail: the how and the why of the answer.
    – MetaEd
    Sep 9, 2012 at 23:27
-2

i think rephrase altogether to shift the focus off the images having some capability. inanimate objects don't really have capabilities. put the focus on the user having the action available. "images for coloring by user", "the user introduces color to the black and white images"

2
  • That's a long tab / button name. I am looking for an adjective.
    – Josh
    Aug 9, 2012 at 12:17
  • how many pixels do we have to work with?
    – Chris
    Aug 9, 2012 at 14:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.