1. He was charged with killing 13 people.
  2. He was charged with having killed 13 people.
  3. He was charged with the crime he killed 13 people.

I suppose the phrase no. 1 is correct but the others also make sense or are they grammatically wrong?

  • 2
    3 looks as if it has two main verbs in a single phrase and would benefit from some adjustment such as "that" or ";" between crime and he – Henry Aug 6 '12 at 11:16
  • 2
    1 and 2 are both correct, but 1, out of any context, is ambiguous: it could mean 'He was assigned the task of killing 13 people.' 3 is syntactically incomplete, as Henry says; I would write 'He was charged with the crime of having killed &c'. – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 6 '12 at 11:38

1 and 2 are correct.

3 is wrong. You could break it into two sentences:

He was charged with the crime. He killed 13 people.

But I think what you really mean is:

He was charged with the crime of killing 13 people.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    3 is just missing a that after crime and before he. Whether you can skate by without it is an open question. – tchrist Aug 6 '12 at 12:29
  • 1
    @tchrist My grammatical intuition tells me very clearly that He was charged with the crime that he killed 13 people. is wrong. I can't explain exactly why, but I'm sure it's wrong. – Pitarou Aug 6 '12 at 12:49
  • 1
    @Pitarou, I think it's your lexical intuition - the sentence is unidiomatic, but grammatically and syntactically unexceptionable. – StoneyB on hiatus Aug 6 '12 at 13:56
  • @StoneyB Is this a matter that can be settled by Google NGram viewer? – Pitarou Aug 6 '12 at 14:05
  • 1
    For the third one adding in which before the second he can fix the grammar. – Noah Aug 6 '12 at 14:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.