English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
I see people often use abstract as a synonym of strange, but what does it actually mean? I've looked up a definition:
thought of apart from concrete realities, specific objects, or actual instances: an abstract idea.
But it makes no sense to me and seems a bit vague. For example, what does it mean when people say that games are just sets of abstract rules?
The short answer is that abstract is the opposite of concrete.
Abstraction is basically a synonym for generalization. When we simplify something by throwing away irrelevant information, we are abstracting or generalizing. For example, a car is a more abstract concept than a Ford Mustang. When we refer to a Mustang as a car, we are generalizing the meaning of a Mustang. We are throwing away information about the object and arriving at a simpler concept, "car" in this case.
Consider the following scale:
Thing <-> Vehicle <-> Car <-> Ford Mustang <-> Shelby GT500KR
When we go to the right, we are becoming more concrete. When we go to the left, we are becoming more abstract. When we add detail, we are being more concrete. When we take away detail, we are being more abstract.
Something is said to be abstract if it is farther to the left in such a scale as something else.
Using the above scale, we could say that "vehicle" is abstract and "Shelby GT500KR" is concrete.
Abstract is a relative term like "tall" and "short". Nothing is tall or short, but only tall or short relative so something else. For example, is the Colosseum in Rome tall? It depends on the context. It is tall compared to a person, it is short compared to the Empire State Building or the CN Tower. When we say something is tall, there is always an implicit context since the word only makes sense relative to the context. We can say that the Colosseum is tall or short, depending if the context is people or buildings. When we say something is tall, we are saying it is tall relative to something else. Otherwise the concept "tall" has no meaning.
Likewise, when we say something is abstract, we are saying it is less concrete than something else. The word "abstract" has no meaning by itself.
Part of the confusion is that dictionaries often mix definitions with examples. So, its easy to confuse an example of abstract with its definition if you read a dictionary. Here are several definitions from the New Oxford American Dictionary:
- existing in thought or as an idea but not having a physical or concrete existence
- dealing with ideas rather than events
- make a written summary of (an article or book)
- an abstract work of art
These are all concrete examples of how the word "abstract" can be used, but they do not define it. These definitions won't help you understand what an Abstract Data Type is in computer science.
Here are some more definitions from the same dictionary:
- not based on a particular instance; theoretical
- denoting an idea, quality, or state rather than a concrete object
- extract or remove (something)
These definitions start to get at what the word actually means.
When something is "abstract", it means that it doesn't have a solid existence. I.e., you can't realize it using any of your senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell). For example, feelings, like happiness or sadness, are abstract. When used with art, though, it usually refers to that kind of art that doesn't describe materialized things, and abstract pieces of art are occasionally called 'strange' -- that's probably what you were talking about.
I think "arbitrary" would be a better fit than "abstract" with reference to game rules, although the games themselves could be regarded as abstract.
Consider chess: although the game can be considered to represent a war between two opposing factions, it does so in ways that are far from the actual realities of war, with defeated pieces being removed from the board.
By contrast, the rules on the ways in which the pieces move - the Queen being the most mobile piece, followed by the Rook (Castle) and Bishop, while the Knight's movements are much more restricted - seem quite whimsical.
