In the children's rhyme:

Johnny and July sitting in a tree
First comes love
Then comes marriage
Then come children in a baby carriage

They are said to be sitting in a tree. Likewise, when a bird is sitting on a branch, we say it's sitting in a tree.

Is it ever correct to say a bird is on a tree?

  • 1
    If the bird were a roc or an elephant bird, and the tree were reasonably small, the bird would most definitely be on the tree, not in it. – Sven Yargs Mar 1 '15 at 19:17

Your case is special. If you were to say two people were "sitting on a tree" in this case, it would imply that the tree was on the ground—i.e., that it had fallen or been cut down. Sitting "in" a tree means sitting in among the branches, most likely at least partly hidden from view.

Further discussion

I wrote the above eight years ago, and still stand by what I say. Nevertheless, there are nuances to everything. Consider first this stanza from W. B. Yeats's "Sailing to Byzantium":

That is no country for old men. The young
In one another's arms, birds in the trees,
—Those dying generations—at their song,
The salmon-falls, the mackerel-crowded seas,
Fish, flesh, or fowl, commend all summer long
Whatever is begotten, born, and dies.
Caught in that sensual music all neglect
Monuments of unageing intellect.

The poet is concerned here to draw a contrast between old and young, and the birds (in the fragment I boldfaced) are on the youth side of that equation. No place, there, for fallen trees; these are youthful, upright and leaf-covered.

Now, the leaves are probably the origin of the use of the preposition in with respect to trees: the birds are in among the leaves. Unless the foliage is sparse, you probably can't even see the birds, though birdsong may announce their presence. They are in among the branches, in among the foliage. Even on a leafless dead or dormant tree, though, we still refer to birds in the trees.

Note, however, that it is entirely proper to say that a bird lights on (or upon) a branch. There it is quite obvious we are close enough to actually see the bird in the tree.

Now, just to confound everyone (and reveal the nuance), consider another reference. This is from The Mikado by Gilbert & Sullivan, from the song "Tit-Willow":

On a tree by a river a little tom-tit
Sang "Willow, titwillow, titwillow"

This is a legitimate usage, one that would seem to contradict my statement about the in usage. But I don't think it does. Gilbert is offering a little sketch of a bird singing, and to do so it must sit on a branch. We're given a close-up of the bird, and the economy of words necessary to lyricize a simple song forces Gilbert to pare down the verbiage, so the ideas are telescoped: "On a branch of a tree" simply wouldn't scan. And had he used in in this case the focus would have been widened to emphasize the tree, not the bird—hardly appropriate to the song of a little bird.

This whole matter just illustrates once again how squishy and difficult prepositions can be in English—or in any language, for that matter.

  • it would imply that the tree was on the ground "Aren't trees always on the ground?" I had to reread it multiple times until I realized that you meant that the tree had fallen or is cut down. – LWTBP Apr 11 '18 at 11:45

Decorations, presents, the fairy, and so on are said to be on the tree, but that is, I think, only a Christmas tree.

Fruit grows on trees, not in them, as sometimes does money.

I've never heard on in that connection with birds, though.

  • 3
    I want to see the tree that has money growing on it. And, can I get one of my own? :) – Will Dec 8 '10 at 14:19
  • I'd like to see such a tree, too. But there are plenty of people who seem to think one exists. – Brian Hooper Dec 8 '10 at 20:08
  • Brian, if enough of us upvote this answer, will you tell us more about these money trees? Specifically, where can I get one, how much does it cost, and can I buy it on credit (using the first year's crop, hopefully! :) – FumbleFingers Mar 1 '15 at 16:52

I would say in a tree, but others might say on.

Some of these below are "on a tree trunk" or "on a tree branch" but some not.

Google NGram for bird on a tree versus bird in a tree:

Google NGram for bird on a tree versus bird in a tree


I would say "in a tree" is more correct. Sylvia Plath wrote "I saw myself sitting in the crotch of this fig tree" (The bell jar, 1967).


Birds sit in a tree, not on a tree. They may be said to be sitting on a tree if they sat on the leaves at the top of the tree, which is never the case.

  • How does this answer differ from any of the existing answers? – MetaEd Apr 26 '13 at 3:52

protected by Mari-Lou A Mar 1 '15 at 16:04

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.