Break even is commonly used in economics to refer to the point where cost and revenue are equal. However, instead of using the long way of saying that

Firm X had reached the point of break even

is it possible to say

Firm X had broken even?

I realise that broke even is in common usage today, but somehow broken even just doesn't sound right. Is it correct or is there a better way of saying it?

3 Answers 3


It is, but you don't need the hyphen.


I think you could simply say "Firm X broke even." It would mean the same thing.

  • +1. I would definitely say something like "I broke even last year," or "the goal is to at least break even."
    – Andrew
    Apr 8, 2012 at 21:03
  • 2
    -1: Past perfect doesn't really "mean the same thing" as simple past tense. Apr 8, 2012 at 21:16
  • @FumbleFingers: Can you please explain how in this instance they mean something different?
    – JLG
    Apr 8, 2012 at 23:54
  • There's nothing special about the compound verb to break even making it unsuitable for past perfect. "Firm X had broken even for three years before it reported a small profit last year", for example. Apr 9, 2012 at 2:17
  • Thank you. I didn't say that I think the past perfect is unsuitable, I just think the simple past is more concise in this instance. For the OP's shorter sentence with no timeframe given, do you think that "Firm X had broken even." differs in meaning from the sentence "Firm X broke even."? (I sincerely want to know this. And I also sincerely appreciate you explaining your vote.)
    – JLG
    Apr 9, 2012 at 3:09

Simple past: I broke even last year. No connection to present. Present perfect: I have broken even. Past but still has connection to present Past perfect: I had broken even until the crash in ... Completed before a time in the past.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.