Is it more correct to say

a) John was appointed as manager of ACME.


b) John was appointed manager of ACME.

Or are they interchangeable?

  • 1
    John was appointed manager of ACME sounds more natural. According to OALD however, as is optional.
    – Irene
    Mar 30, 2012 at 11:08

2 Answers 2


Then there's also:

c) John was appointed to be manager of ACME

All three are interchangeable in terms of meaning, but the one without as or to be is the most common:

If you're looking for one to use, I would go for was appointed manager, just because it sounds more natural.


If you look for 'appoint' in online English-English dictionaries like Merriam-Webster, Longman, Collins, Macmillan or others you'll see both cases where 'as' is used and those where 'as' is omitted. To me absence of 'as' makes the appointment sound that much more solemn and serious, i.e. its more formal. But I guess its a matter of style and personal preference and both options can be used interchangeably.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.