0

I'm trying to remember a word from when I studied for my degree in English Lit and Lang. It describes a viewpoint as if looking down from above and moving in and down, like when watching a film and the camera pans in from above and down, describing what you see.

I think it's maybe like transcendental but that feels incorrect; any ideas?

12
  • The camera would be zooming, not panning. Commented Sep 8 at 16:23
  • 2
    @TinfoilHat Moving towards or away from the subject is zooming. Moving up/down or left/right is panning.
    – Barmar
    Commented Sep 8 at 16:27
  • You could try asking in Movies & TV. They're more likely to know film industry terminology.
    – Barmar
    Commented Sep 8 at 16:28
  • Are you looking for crane shot?
    – user405662
    Commented Sep 8 at 17:03
  • 1
    Can you provide an example of the shot, because people don't know what you're talking about? Also, do you want a technical filmmaking term or not?
    – Stuart F
    Commented Sep 8 at 21:54

2 Answers 2

1

Pedestal
Also known as a Boom up/down, our final shot is the pedestal. This involves moving the camera up or down relative to a subject. […] A pedestal shot can be used to frame a tall or high subject (such as a building) while keeping the framing at eye level.

SOURCE: Seenit 7 Basic Camera Movements (And Why They Matter!)

4
  • No, pedestal is not from above. In any case, I think OP is looking for a literary description of that effect, not a technical camera one. Commented Sep 8 at 18:36
  • @TinfoilHat Is your suggestion "zooming" literary? That's also a typical feature on cameras. What does "…the camera pans in from above and down describing what you see." mean then? It must be a visual effect, I don't think it exists as a literary device, does it? The same can be said for panning Is it because the OP's description is missing the "either... or"? The OP also says the word they are looking for sounds like "transcedental" [sic]. 🤷🏻‍♀️
    – Mari-Lou A
    Commented Sep 8 at 18:51
  • No zooming is not literary, not was it an answer; I was just correcting OP’s panning term. Commented Sep 8 at 19:06
  • Panning isn't wrong…if a camera moves up and down, from side to side that is panning, "moving in and down” is ambiguous, does it mean to get nearer its subject and lower at the same time, or was it a typo: "in and out" vs "up and down", don't think we'll ever know.
    – Mari-Lou A
    Commented Sep 8 at 19:12
1

In literature, this sounds like an omniscient point of view (sees all/“zoomed out”), shifting to a regular third person point of view (“zoomed in”):

Third-person limited
There’s a clue in the name of this point of view: limited. In third-person limited, you stick to one character’s perspective and are “zoomed in” on them. . . .

Third-person omniscient
In third-person omniscient, we still use third person (he did this, she did that, they did this). However, omniscient is “zoomed out”. The narrative doesn’t come from the point of view of any one character. It comes from the point of view of an external, godlike narrator, who knows everything about the story and its characters.

Source: Point of view: What’s the difference between third-person limited and omniscient?

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .