5

There is a legal phrase "without let or hindrance".

The word "let" seems peculiar, and actually opposite to the usual meaning.

Looking for the origin of this particular useage. Is it, perhaps, a separate word that is only coincidentally the same spelling? Is it ever used in this sense outside of that specific phrase.?

1 Answer 1

9

It's "let" as a noun. Two dictionaries with that example:
AHD let
let (2) noun 1. Something that hinders; an obstacle:
free to investigate without let or hindrance.

It's also in Merriam-Webster:
M-W let
: something that impedes : obstruction
ruled his little world without hindrance or let—

"Let" as that noun has its own etymology:
etymonline let
The link says it's obsolete except in legal contexts.

That makes it a homograph of other senses of "let".

4
  • Thank you. It seems it is only used in that particular phrase.
    – Pete
    Commented Aug 13 at 5:40
  • 9
    It's used with the same sense in tennis
    – AakashM
    Commented Aug 13 at 9:04
  • @AakashM I'm not quite sure about that. That tennis "let" might be about hindrance, or it might also be about allowance, relating to the verb sense of "let". I didn't find any reference about that. Commented Aug 13 at 22:40
  • @JackO'Flaherty /shrug, OED is sure. Sorry, bit terse, it's here, but that's paywalled - although membership of many UK libraries gives access, if that helps
    – AakashM
    Commented Aug 14 at 8:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.