The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Pages 438-9) has these subsections under §13 Peripheral modifiers:
(e) Reflexive pronouns
[7] [The manager h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲] had approved the proposal.
In this construction an NP with the form of a reflexive pronoun functions as post-head modifier within a larger NP; it is an external rather than internal modifier in that the immediate constituents of the matrix NP are the manager + herself (not the + manager herself). [...]
(f) Combinations
An NP may contain more than one peripheral modifier, with multiple layers of embedding:
[8] i Make sure you invite [Jill h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲ t̲o̲o̲].
ii [E̲v̲e̲n̲ m̲e̲r̲e̲l̲y̲ a formal apology] would be acceptable.
iii After [f̲i̲n̲a̲n̲c̲i̲a̲l̲l̲y̲ c̲e̲r̲t̲a̲i̲n̲l̲y̲ the worst crisis this decade], the emerging economies will take some time to recover.
The bracketed NP in [i] has the NP Jill herself as head and the adverb too as peripheral modifier; at the next level, the NP Jill is head and the NP herself is peripheral modifier. A peripheral modifier is thus in peripheral position (initial or final) in the NP of which it is an immediate constituent, but need not be in peripheral position in a larger NP containing it.
Based on this, I wonder how we should parse the noun phrase 'Even the manager herself' as in [7']:
[7'] [E̲v̲e̲n̲ the manager h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲] had approved the proposal.
Here, both Even and herself are what CGEL calls peripheral modifiers. Here are some parsing options I can think of:
(1) E̲v̲e̲n̲ + [the manager + h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲];
(2) [E̲v̲e̲n̲ + the manager] + h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲; or
(3) E̲v̲e̲n̲ + [the manager] + h̲e̲r̲s̲e̲l̲f̲
Which is correct? Or is there any other way?