Here are two statements:
The first statement is:
To every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction.
The second statement is:
For every action there is always an equal and opposite reaction.
Now, can anyone explain what the actual difference is between these versions?
Actually the first statement is known as Newton’s Third Law of Motion. But the question suddenly came to mind: Would there be any difference if I were to replace To with For?
And for this reason only I thought for asking this question in this community.