0

This has cropped up several times in the past couple of months, and I've been struggling to find a fitting word to describe this phenomenon. I'll describe it:

You have two choices(no, it's not Hobson's choice). Both of them are desirable, yet both of them each have a tiny part which is most undesirable, such as a tough condition, or a demanding clause. You have difficulty deciding which one to pick.

Whenever something like that comes up, I think of the expression "Can't burn a candle at both ends", but I'm not looking for that.

I'm looking for an expression that describes a difficult choice. Any suggestions?

EDIT: It's idiomatic. I'm quite sure it is. It's an expression of some sort. And no, it isn't "dilemma"

Improve this question
8
  • What happens if there is no such word for your concept? – Mitch Mar 6 '12 at 14:33
  • @Mitch, true, and that is what I fear. – Bidella Mar 6 '12 at 23:57
  • I guess I'm asking if you just want a term badly or if you think you've heard it before and just want to be reminded. – Mitch Mar 7 '12 at 0:56
  • 1
    I think you've probably gone beyond any standard idiomatic expressions by specifying two different largely unrelated constraints. Firstly, both of them "are desirable", presumably with the implication that you can only pick one. Secondly, both "have a tiny part which is most undesirable". Ignore the second, and you want to have your cake and eat it. Ignore the first, and you've got pros and cons – FumbleFingers Mar 7 '12 at 1:20
  • @FumbleFingers! That's it! That's the idiom I've been trying to describe. Make it into answer! – Bidella Mar 7 '12 at 2:36
3

Perhaps you are facing the same problem as a Buridan's ass - an ass caught between two similarly inviting choices.

Morton's fork is similar, but with both choices undesirable.

Improve this answer
3
  • The Paradox of Buridan's Ass expresses being unable to choose between two equally valuable outcomes, and thus captures what the OP is looking for. – Gnawme Mar 6 '12 at 6:38
  • @Gnawme, in the Buridan's ass paradox, the alternatives do not include the "tiny part which is most undesirable" element called for in question. (The same is true of toss-up and six of one, half a dozen of the other.) – James Waldby - jwpat7 Mar 7 '12 at 2:21
  • @jwpat7 Yeah, if you factor in that little requirement, I'm not sure that there's anything idiomatic that fits. – Gnawme Mar 7 '12 at 5:31
2

You are "between a rock and a hard place".

Improve this answer
0
1

I guess the word/phrase you are looking for is "toss-up", as quoted from http://www.learn-english-today.com:

When there are two options or possibilities to chose from, and both are equally good, the choice between the two is referred to as a toss-up (like tossing a coin). "Both boxers are in excellent condition. It's a toss-up which of them will win the match."

Improve this answer
1

You might consider 'It's six of one, half a dozen the other.'

Improve this answer
1
  • Although this is more generally used for two choices where there is nothig between them, it does work well here. It is also well known, and probably better understood than Shyams suggestions, good as they are. – Schroedingers Cat Mar 6 '12 at 9:40
1

You might be caught between the Scylla and Charybdis:

Being between Scylla and Charybdis is an idiom deriving from Greek mythology. Several other idioms, such as "on the horns of a dilemma", "between the devil and the deep blue sea", and "between a rock and a hard place" express the same meaning of "having to choose between two evils".

Improve this answer
1

I think OP has really gone beyond any standard idiomatic expressions by specifying two different largely unrelated constraints.

  • both choices "are desirable", but there's the implication that you can only pick one.

The standard expression there is you want to have your cake and eat it. Often poorly understood, this means you can't continue to own your cake if you eat it, because then it's "gone".

  • Both choices "have a tiny part which is most undesirable".

Here, each choice has pros and cons. The fact that the "pros" and the "cons" may be very unequal is irrelevant to the use of this expression.

Improve this answer
0

Dilemma, "a circumstance in which a choice must be made between two or more alternatives that seem equally undesirable" is frequently used for situations somewhat like you describe. (Note, wiktionary also says "the sense of a difficult circumstance or problem is considered non-standard" by some.) Etymonline says dilemma arose in the 1520's,

from L.L. dilemma, from Gk. dilemma "double proposition," a technical term in rhetoric, from di- "two" + lemma "premise, anything received or taken," from root of lambanein "to take" (see analemma). It should be used only of situations where someone is forced to choose between two alternatives, both unfavorable to him

which supports the notion that the choices are unfavorable. Unfortunately, this word does not have the connotation of the choices being mostly favorable and partly (but seriously) unfavorable, which your question calls for. Perhaps you could use delicious dilemma or tasty dilemma.

Improve this answer
2
  • My situation is slightly different. A "dilemma" is where both choices are equally undesirable. Mine is where both choices are equally hogged with undesirable parts only, but are mostly desirable – Bidella Mar 6 '12 at 5:57
  • @Bidella, but each choice is equally undesirable. Choosing either one means accepting the undesirable condition you mentioned, and also forgoing the other option (obviously undesirable). – Sam Mar 7 '12 at 2:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.