1

Is there a name for the usage of the name of a well-known personality as an argument in a conversation, not by using a citation or an opinion of him/her, but an alleged quality?

I found this to be used a lot in TED talks or personal development books/conferences. For me, it's different from the "argument from authority" because it's not a citation nor an opinion from the personality but more about a quality given to the person. Or is it?

Example:

Mandela was a great leader, and he was "something", so all leaders should be "something".

1 Answer 1

0

It is technically known as Association fallacy :

It goes like this , In general :
Premise: A is a B
Premise: A is also a C
Conclusion: Therefore, all Bs are Cs

In your Case :
Mandela was a great leader
Mandela was "something" (Educated ? Black ? Humble ? African ? tall ?)
So all leaders should be "something" (Educated ? Black ? Humble ? African ? tall ?)

In case the Quality is not known to be true or known to be not true , then consider using a related Concept :

Cargo Cult : A cargo cult is an indigenist millenarian belief system, in which adherents perform rituals which they believe will cause a more technologically advanced society to deliver goods.

In your Case , we may think that leaders must try emulating Mandela (perform rituals) believing that great things (deliver goods) will then occur.

Putting those together we get , "Association fallacy leading to Cargo Cult" or "Cargo Cult involving Association fallacy" or other combinations.

4
  • 1
    Don't forget that cargo cults are limited to certain societies in the Pacific; it's a bit of a stretch to use the expression to refer to a particular attitude in general. Nov 25, 2022 at 16:21
  • 2
    It has got some wider usage too [ Eg tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/CargoCult + en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_science ] @KateBunting
    – Prem
    Nov 25, 2022 at 18:25
  • You haven't answered the question at all.
    – Lambie
    Jan 22 at 16:55
  • The OP's example does not fit the general form of the fallacy. Crucial to the example is that its conclusion contains a should, which does not correspond to anything in the general form of the fallacy, as presented here.
    – jsw29
    Jan 22 at 22:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.