Today I was told that "I give nothing to..." cannot be used as "nothing" does not exist and so I cannot give it. But don't you often say "I have nothing to do"? How come that in this case it works, how can you have "nothing" to do? And one additional one, "I have no idea" is correct, what about "I do not have any idea"? Imho this is correct too, right? Thanks
-
2You'll surely have noticed that the answer telling you that was massively downvoted (-5, as I write). My answer (currently +5) said there was nothing wrong with any of these variations (except you should avoid "double negatives" in formal contexts). Do you really need to ask what is effectively the same question, just to confirm what you've already been told?– FumbleFingersCommented Mar 1, 2012 at 1:00
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
You have been misinformed. It's perfectly grammatical to "give nothing", just as to "have nothing", "love nobody", "want nothing" or "go nowhere", etc.
answered Feb 29, 2012 at 22:08
-
Hmm so I can say "I give nothing to nobody"? I want to say "I do not give anything to anybody".– PietroCommented Feb 29, 2012 at 22:10
-
That's a question of double negatives which is a whole another story. You should start another thread for that, I believe. Commented Feb 29, 2012 at 22:14
-
1Oh, yes you are right. So what about "I give nothing to you". Is that correct? I would say "I do not give you anything" but I want to understand whether or not the first one is possible.– PietroCommented Feb 29, 2012 at 22:27
-
Both are correct and equally possible. You would choose depending on the previous context. Commented Feb 29, 2012 at 23:04
-
1"I give nothing to you" is possible, but I think it's less common than "I give you nothing".– user16269Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 0:19
I think it is easy if you read nothing as 'no thing(s)', where thing can also be I have no thing(s) (or tasks) to do.
answered Mar 1, 2012 at 2:05
